If interested e.mail me.

Women’s Studies courses are always taught by the most damaged females who try to turn everything into a control issue. If you ever hear the phrase “sex is all about power”, come out of someone, fucking RUN and don’t look back. Never date girls who buy into the course (MARRY the ones who admit to taking it just for an easy A and think it’s all bullshit).

And the woman below the man is the only blowjob position? Not only has that person never had good sex, they quite possibly have never had ANY sex, and only has access to the most boring porn.

That to which you seem to be partial sounds like true libertarian capitalism, and if it were possible, it would be a vast improvement over crony-corporate oligarchism, even if your economic libertarian system had its own downside. The problem is, free-market ideology as promoted by the rich tends to lead to crony-coporate oligarchism in manner somewhat similar to the way revolutionary socialism tends to lead to communist-party dictatorship. Perfect libertarian capitalism may be a more realistic ideal than perfect Marxian socialism, and a crony-oligarchist capitalism may be preferable to communist dictatorship (communism really, really sucked bitter ass, as we all know), but there is still a certain amount of parallelism between the two sets of “ideal vs. reality”.

Oh yeah. Fine job Mr. Walker.
…no pun intended.

The bankers were able to successfully lobby the Federal Government into casting a blind eye on the need for regulatory oversight of derivatives. Indeed, had proper oversight been made, derivatives would have been regulated by gaming commissions and not the SEC.

According to F.A. Hayek,Capitalism has evolved spontaneously, much like language, from traditions and morals somewhere between instinct and reason. [ the desire to "Fuck someone over" is an instinctual- the desire to help others unconditionally, altruism, is patently false because even the actor at the smallest collective group spurs others to action from alterior motive]. Millions of decisions are made daily regarding several property and capital goods by self-interest promoting actors. This spontaneous order allows for a prosperity and impersonal altruism. Indeed, we may not be happier, but we are generally much more prosperous than our predacessors 50 years before us.

It is a fatal conceit (a book by Hayek) for humans to believe that they can plan and control economic outputs to create common equality among mankind. I posit, in accordance with Hayek, that all outcomes are the results of human action, not human planning.

I challenge all of you to read “The Road to Serfdom” and “The Fatal Conceit” by Hayek. Perhaps then you will better understand the questions of POLITICAL ECONOMY.

Regards.

The big thing that made capitalism “successful”, insofar as its advocates measure success, was very cheap and very abundant fossil-fuel energy that made it possible to exploit much more effectively with fossil-fuel-powered machinery the resources of the planet. We are now entering the period in which the supply of these vital fuels is in decline while demand continues to increase. (Yes, there’s lots of coal, but most of what’s left is the crappier higher-pollution, lower-energy kind.) That has a lot to do with why the bills for Wall Street’s Ponzi schemes are coming due about now.

Another interesting thing about Credit Default Swaps I have learned is that as many people who want to can purchase one of these “insurance policies” on a debt-based “asset”. Using your example, that would be like all of us commenters here thinking, “Wow, that Mark Ames isn’t long for this world what with all the rednecks he’s pissed off. So if anyone can buy life insurance on his mortal existence and get paid handsomely once he buys the proverbial farm, I want in, too!” So, let’s say, 500 people have bought a very handsomely-paying policy on Mr. Ames’s mortal existence. So on, let’s say, Easter Sunday, he finally croaks, albeit from a massive cocaine overdose rather than some berserker redneck loser with a sawed-off shotgun. How does the agency that sold the policies come up with the moolah to pay all 500 of us??? Hello imminent bankruptcy!!!

Was it Liars Poker when a junior was going on a business trip and one of the seniors flipped a few hundred dollars and said “buy a life insurance with me as beneficiary” “why” asked the junior “I’m feeling lucky” came the reply from the cynical senior

But CDSs bring back moral hazard in another way, especially if they see that the policy is worth more than the house for example, holders may like you to burn the house down in order to be able to make a claim

The Roman Army thought that Imperialism was the best economic system out there, and after a few centuries, only too late, realized that Imperialism led to the Huns taking a liking of plundering Rome, as well as inner corruption, and there went the empire. No economic system ever, is the best. And if humanity fails to constantly improve its economic system, we will face World War III, game over. In the Middle Ages, Monarch and Usury was all the rage, and then we had slave trading, so economic systems evolve. Time to get with the times.

Forget idiots like me, eXiled! That’s not what earned you your chops. The readers deserve crap. The readers demand that I shuttup. The readers revel in exactly the opposite of what I revel in.

They, the readers, WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ME!

In conclusion, capitalism only worked well for rich British assholes sucking out resources from their colonies. The American version just went into epic fail as popular resource-sucking region Latin America has about two American-aligned leaders left, and Asia and Saudi Arabia having the nuclear option on US currency.

What’s most likely going to happen when politicians start pushing austerity measures through like we were some IMF-controlled banana republic is somebody’s going to come along and say “look over there!” If they are smart they won’t go after some country that can really do some damage, but it will likely be attack Cuba or attack Iran or some shit.

States will defeat capitalism because it’s a dirty joke that leads to monopolies and corruption. Anarchist socialism would be fine with me, but the ‘fuck you’ classes will probably destroy it cause they like smacking people around. Either that or they will never trust a system that can’t tell other people what to do through force.

by state gambling/lottery commissions.

They have no place in the market.

Okay, put the Ouija board away. It’s time to let the old man have a peaceful afterlife already.

… I mean can’t a sneeringly condescending old magician of ideological-hackery be allowed to be dead in peace? When his work is done and he’s finally a corpse? “Treated like a discardable peace of machinery today? Life ruined in order to enrich the shareholders and corporate pay-bosses? Wha. That’s Capitalism my friend. Now watch me pull FREEDOM outta my hat!”

If a person knows a bit about the history of US markets there are plenty of precedents for insane confidence and equally insane fear.

Indeed, upheaval and collapse is the rule rather than the exception in American economic history. Panic of 1907? Crime of ’73? Mr Jackson’s quarrel with Mr Biddle?
The list goes on and on.

The problem these days is globalization and interdependence of markets. If Wall Street catches a cold, so many other places come down with terminal cancer.

Your staff may believe in socialism but you voted with your feet. I think you also forgot about real class warfare in the Russian revolution.

Please send me jpegs of Hannah Katz’s and Mark Ames sister’s snappers.