
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geithner Lifts Ass For Chinese Masters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/</link>
	<description>All the news not fit to print: Gary Brecher the War Nerd, Mark Ames, Yasha Levine, Eileen Jones and the rest of Team eXiled</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:04:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktrpf</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7367</link>
		<dc:creator>ktrpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7367</guid>
		<description>Dante, you&#039;re just repeating (empirically unfounded) silly trivialities you picked up on TV. The technological superiority of the US over China is still huge, and that gap will probably never close. The output of American industry is still larger than that of China, and way more complex. Most of China&#039;s industrial output is assembling imported components with minimal value added.
The US pumps out way more new patents, research, science publications etc. than China.

Read this: &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.lclark.edu/%7Emarty/China--RRPE%20forthcoming.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Chinese Reform Experience, A Critical Assessment&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dante, you&#8217;re just repeating (empirically unfounded) silly trivialities you picked up on TV. The technological superiority of the US over China is still huge, and that gap will probably never close. The output of American industry is still larger than that of China, and way more complex. Most of China&#8217;s industrial output is assembling imported components with minimal value added.<br />
The US pumps out way more new patents, research, science publications etc. than China.</p>
<p>Read this: <a HREF="http://www.lclark.edu/%7Emarty/China--RRPE%20forthcoming.pdf" rel="nofollow">The Chinese Reform Experience, A Critical Assessment</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dante</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7347</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7347</guid>
		<description>Paul Yarbles: &lt;i&gt;This allows China to actually produce what the rest of the world wants while America becomes like H.G. Wells’ Eloi.&lt;/i&gt;

But Western universities are too busy producing man-hating feminists in &quot;Gender Studies,&quot; and raising good little anti-Western preachers through a thousand different sociology classes, to have time for something so filthy as to learn how to produce &lt;b&gt;goods&lt;/b&gt;! Obviously the Chinese haven&#039;t realized how the focus on engineering, mathematics, physics and chemistry only hurts society. Don&#039;t they want &lt;b&gt;progress&lt;/b&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Yarbles: <i>This allows China to actually produce what the rest of the world wants while America becomes like H.G. Wells’ Eloi.</i></p>
<p>But Western universities are too busy producing man-hating feminists in &#8220;Gender Studies,&#8221; and raising good little anti-Western preachers through a thousand different sociology classes, to have time for something so filthy as to learn how to produce <b>goods</b>! Obviously the Chinese haven&#8217;t realized how the focus on engineering, mathematics, physics and chemistry only hurts society. Don&#8217;t they want <b>progress</b>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hydrogen bomb</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7311</link>
		<dc:creator>hydrogen bomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7311</guid>
		<description>Does it make me gay if I find that photoshop job arousing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it make me gay if I find that photoshop job arousing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: interesting study on this</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7300</link>
		<dc:creator>interesting study on this</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7300</guid>
		<description>&quot;Moreover, the structure of China’s trade has been undergoing significant change during the 2000s. In 2000, about one third of China’s exports went to Developing Asia, about 53% went to the US, Japan and the European Union and the remaining 14% went to ‘Other Countries’.
However, by 2007, while the share of China’s exports to Developing Asia remained roughly the same, its share going to the US, Japan and the European Union dropped by 15 percentage points to about 38% while its share going to ‘Other Countries’ rose to almost 29%.
The share of China’s exports shipped to the US declined from about 20% in 2000 to about 16% in 2007 (Asian Development Outlook 2009, Table A11). This being the case, the Chinese policy of pegging its renminbi to the dollar does not make a great deal of sense—nor does pumping reserves into US securities in order to abate depreciation of the dollar. China is bound to abandon such an increasingly ineffective and risky strategy, and appears already to have taken steps to do so.&quot;

&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.soas.ac.uk/cdpr/publications/pb/file51659.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Will Pinning the Blame on China Help Correct Global Imbalances?&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Moreover, the structure of China’s trade has been undergoing significant change during the 2000s. In 2000, about one third of China’s exports went to Developing Asia, about 53% went to the US, Japan and the European Union and the remaining 14% went to ‘Other Countries’.<br />
However, by 2007, while the share of China’s exports to Developing Asia remained roughly the same, its share going to the US, Japan and the European Union dropped by 15 percentage points to about 38% while its share going to ‘Other Countries’ rose to almost 29%.<br />
The share of China’s exports shipped to the US declined from about 20% in 2000 to about 16% in 2007 (Asian Development Outlook 2009, Table A11). This being the case, the Chinese policy of pegging its renminbi to the dollar does not make a great deal of sense—nor does pumping reserves into US securities in order to abate depreciation of the dollar. China is bound to abandon such an increasingly ineffective and risky strategy, and appears already to have taken steps to do so.&#8221;</p>
<p><a HREF="http://www.soas.ac.uk/cdpr/publications/pb/file51659.pdf" rel="nofollow">Will Pinning the Blame on China Help Correct Global Imbalances?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coldequation</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7252</link>
		<dc:creator>coldequation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7252</guid>
		<description>Geithner is lying his ass off.  No way is Obama going to cut spending or raise taxes that much, not unless he absolutely has to, like California has to now.  But what do you expect him to say?  That these bonds are going to be worthless, but keep buying them anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geithner is lying his ass off.  No way is Obama going to cut spending or raise taxes that much, not unless he absolutely has to, like California has to now.  But what do you expect him to say?  That these bonds are going to be worthless, but keep buying them anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktrpf</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7251</link>
		<dc:creator>ktrpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7251</guid>
		<description>First of all, I don&#039;t see what&#039;s so cool about obsessively using anal sex-imagery to describe economic questions. I don&#039;t think it makes your stories more revealing, all I feel is a faint sense of disgust and puzzlement why someone feels compelled to repeat over and over &quot;we&#039;re rock hard&quot; and so on.
why don&#039;t you cut that out? thanks.

On the issue itself: I think there&#039;s a good chance that you get this completely wrong. Who&#039;s in danger with holding all those Treasuries and agency debt? China or the US?
Well, actually, it&#039;s quite possible that neither of them, but if someone&#039;s in trouble it&#039;s rather China, not the US. 
China became extremely export-dependent in the last 10 years, exports amounting to 40% of its GDP, but almost all of this is import-reexport stuff, meaning imported components coming in from other Asian countries, assembled in China, reexported to the US and Europe. China has lost control of a large part of its industrial base and technological development in the process. The bulk of its social and health system hs been dismantled, creating a 100-150 million strong migrnat proletariat, deprived of social services, insurance etc., relying on precarious employment in cities, now becoming unemployed by the millions.
The countryside is in turmoil. Environemental destruction is severe, the Pearl River delta has probably become the most polluted area of the world. One could go on.
The point is, China has enormous internal problems, and if the US devalues (i don&#039;t think it will, but who knows), it&#039;s China who&#039;s gonna be screwed, not the US. in per capita terms the US is about ten times richer than China, and could (probably) easily rebuild (in an emergency) the industries that went abroad, however, China has smthng like 500-700 million peasants who still live in premodern conditions etc.

(Check out this article on recent Chinese economic history: &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.solidarity-us.org/node/1940&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Realities of China Today&lt;/A&gt;)

So the premise of this article is probably completely wrong in the first place.
IT IS TRUE however, that Geithner works for Wall Street, and has a ghastly record as an IMF-executioner of East Asia. On that we agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s so cool about obsessively using anal sex-imagery to describe economic questions. I don&#8217;t think it makes your stories more revealing, all I feel is a faint sense of disgust and puzzlement why someone feels compelled to repeat over and over &#8220;we&#8217;re rock hard&#8221; and so on.<br />
why don&#8217;t you cut that out? thanks.</p>
<p>On the issue itself: I think there&#8217;s a good chance that you get this completely wrong. Who&#8217;s in danger with holding all those Treasuries and agency debt? China or the US?<br />
Well, actually, it&#8217;s quite possible that neither of them, but if someone&#8217;s in trouble it&#8217;s rather China, not the US.<br />
China became extremely export-dependent in the last 10 years, exports amounting to 40% of its GDP, but almost all of this is import-reexport stuff, meaning imported components coming in from other Asian countries, assembled in China, reexported to the US and Europe. China has lost control of a large part of its industrial base and technological development in the process. The bulk of its social and health system hs been dismantled, creating a 100-150 million strong migrnat proletariat, deprived of social services, insurance etc., relying on precarious employment in cities, now becoming unemployed by the millions.<br />
The countryside is in turmoil. Environemental destruction is severe, the Pearl River delta has probably become the most polluted area of the world. One could go on.<br />
The point is, China has enormous internal problems, and if the US devalues (i don&#8217;t think it will, but who knows), it&#8217;s China who&#8217;s gonna be screwed, not the US. in per capita terms the US is about ten times richer than China, and could (probably) easily rebuild (in an emergency) the industries that went abroad, however, China has smthng like 500-700 million peasants who still live in premodern conditions etc.</p>
<p>(Check out this article on recent Chinese economic history: <a HREF="http://www.solidarity-us.org/node/1940" rel="nofollow">The Realities of China Today</a>)</p>
<p>So the premise of this article is probably completely wrong in the first place.<br />
IT IS TRUE however, that Geithner works for Wall Street, and has a ghastly record as an IMF-executioner of East Asia. On that we agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asehpe</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7249</link>
		<dc:creator>Asehpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7249</guid>
		<description>What the heck? All of this just to say that the US owes money to China, and will go on owing more and more? And that the prospects are bad -- the Chinese are getting more power over the US?

No shit Sherlock. Really. So you do have eyes. Gee, if only you didn&#039;t obsess about gay porn photoshopped with politicians&#039; heads...

Tough times. So be it. Makes the future more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck? All of this just to say that the US owes money to China, and will go on owing more and more? And that the prospects are bad &#8212; the Chinese are getting more power over the US?</p>
<p>No shit Sherlock. Really. So you do have eyes. Gee, if only you didn&#8217;t obsess about gay porn photoshopped with politicians&#8217; heads&#8230;</p>
<p>Tough times. So be it. Makes the future more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarky</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7245</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7245</guid>
		<description>China has two options: 

Option 1: Fuck the US
Option 2: Allow the US to fuck China

Recently in Georgia, &quot;NATO&quot; (read US + crazy European conservative nuts) tried to offer the same choices to Russia. Guess which one Russia picked? I&#039;ll give you guys a hint: The Russian Army wasn&#039;t the one taking it in the ass, and then the pissed off Russians, (thank you western corporate media idiots) exposed all those fancy tactics and pointed out that US-trained armies are very defeatable when fighting actual armies, not tanks driving on a highway. 

Can&#039;t the US learn to give better options? I thought Cheney&#039;s not in office anymore. Oh, yeah - I&#039;m going to place $1000000 on China picking Option 1. Anyone want to take that bet? As for nukes, US won&#039;t use them first, because the nuked countries will send their nuclear missiles at those behind the strikes, the Cheneys, and the Cheneys care too much for their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has two options: </p>
<p>Option 1: Fuck the US<br />
Option 2: Allow the US to fuck China</p>
<p>Recently in Georgia, &#8220;NATO&#8221; (read US + crazy European conservative nuts) tried to offer the same choices to Russia. Guess which one Russia picked? I&#8217;ll give you guys a hint: The Russian Army wasn&#8217;t the one taking it in the ass, and then the pissed off Russians, (thank you western corporate media idiots) exposed all those fancy tactics and pointed out that US-trained armies are very defeatable when fighting actual armies, not tanks driving on a highway. </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t the US learn to give better options? I thought Cheney&#8217;s not in office anymore. Oh, yeah &#8211; I&#8217;m going to place $1000000 on China picking Option 1. Anyone want to take that bet? As for nukes, US won&#8217;t use them first, because the nuked countries will send their nuclear missiles at those behind the strikes, the Cheneys, and the Cheneys care too much for their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rook Godzirra</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7241</link>
		<dc:creator>Rook Godzirra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7241</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not real. If you look closely it is photoshopped.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not real. If you look closely it is photoshopped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7238</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7238</guid>
		<description>The point of the article being? That the US owes money to China? We already knew that. That &quot;Team Exiled&quot; obsesses over gay sex? We already knew that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of the article being? That the US owes money to China? We already knew that. That &#8220;Team Exiled&#8221; obsesses over gay sex? We already knew that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7230</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7230</guid>
		<description>Hey, you got the 2257 info on that rice porn there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you got the 2257 info on that rice porn there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stereo</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7218</link>
		<dc:creator>stereo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7218</guid>
		<description>I actually want to fuck Americans too. But not all of them - maybe a couple of girls. 

And if Geithner is preparing a big orgy maybe the turmoil will give serfs like me a chance?

I don&#039;t really understand Ames&#039;es pathos, don&#039;t really see the benefits of fighting (even if i could) against the bankers conspiracy. 

Why should we hate the financiers?

We, useless male slaves, are their natural ally against the industrial capital, military, businesswomen &#039;Devil wears Prada&#039; dominatrixes and the like. 

Fuck America! 
Hail the bankers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually want to fuck Americans too. But not all of them &#8211; maybe a couple of girls. </p>
<p>And if Geithner is preparing a big orgy maybe the turmoil will give serfs like me a chance?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really understand Ames&#8217;es pathos, don&#8217;t really see the benefits of fighting (even if i could) against the bankers conspiracy. </p>
<p>Why should we hate the financiers?</p>
<p>We, useless male slaves, are their natural ally against the industrial capital, military, businesswomen &#8216;Devil wears Prada&#8217; dominatrixes and the like. </p>
<p>Fuck America!<br />
Hail the bankers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlito</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7217</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7217</guid>
		<description>Local Americans aren`t going to be picking up the tab for anything. With what are you going to pick up the tab? You don`t have any money, you are not producing anything. The only reason your greenbacks have any purchasing power is because the Chinese are foolishly shipping it to you.

You haven`t picked up the tab for the last 20 years of your consumption and you think Obama can bail out Wallstreet off your backs? Think again.

You are going to need more and more bailouts, running larger and larger deficits and sooner or later the Chinese are going to get fed up with financing them.

Then you can have your class war or whatever, we certainly won`t be interested in reading about it as you`ll be a fucking backwater. Moldova with nukes. But with uglier women.

At best we are going to send a few expat journalists so they can write about buying 20 dollar whores in Boise, Idaho. While we happily live under our new imperial masters the Chinese. 

It`s going to be a breeze of fresh air. To be finally free of all the fucking hypocrisy and propaganda. At least the Chinese have the decency to do their Imperialism old school. Low on all the CNN crap, high on an iron boot up your arse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Local Americans aren`t going to be picking up the tab for anything. With what are you going to pick up the tab? You don`t have any money, you are not producing anything. The only reason your greenbacks have any purchasing power is because the Chinese are foolishly shipping it to you.</p>
<p>You haven`t picked up the tab for the last 20 years of your consumption and you think Obama can bail out Wallstreet off your backs? Think again.</p>
<p>You are going to need more and more bailouts, running larger and larger deficits and sooner or later the Chinese are going to get fed up with financing them.</p>
<p>Then you can have your class war or whatever, we certainly won`t be interested in reading about it as you`ll be a fucking backwater. Moldova with nukes. But with uglier women.</p>
<p>At best we are going to send a few expat journalists so they can write about buying 20 dollar whores in Boise, Idaho. While we happily live under our new imperial masters the Chinese. </p>
<p>It`s going to be a breeze of fresh air. To be finally free of all the fucking hypocrisy and propaganda. At least the Chinese have the decency to do their Imperialism old school. Low on all the CNN crap, high on an iron boot up your arse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7213</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7213</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a good analysis of the various better, (but still not very good) and worse (downright chilling) ways this scenario might play out.


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KF03Dj03.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a good analysis of the various better, (but still not very good) and worse (downright chilling) ways this scenario might play out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KF03Dj03.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/KF03Dj03.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Kapo</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7211</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Kapo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7211</guid>
		<description>@chinaman as long as the chinese students did not throw shoes -_- we have bought ourselves a lilttle more time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chinaman as long as the chinese students did not throw shoes -_- we have bought ourselves a lilttle more time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Realist</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7210</link>
		<dc:creator>Realist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7210</guid>
		<description>You make your own running shoes, gwailo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make your own running shoes, gwailo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cap'n Kapo</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7209</link>
		<dc:creator>Cap'n Kapo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7209</guid>
		<description>oic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinaman</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7207</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 04:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7207</guid>
		<description>Chinese students laugh at Tim Geithner:

http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSPEK14475620090601</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chinese students laugh at Tim Geithner:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSPEK14475620090601" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSPEK14475620090601</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7200</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7200</guid>
		<description>I hate literary studies professors, but I remember one accidentally caused me to realize the whole Pocahontas story was hilarious propaganda to get stupid rich Britishers to invest in colonialism. &quot;The old Indians are fools, but the young, fertile mind-slut Native Americans can be seduced (raped).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate literary studies professors, but I remember one accidentally caused me to realize the whole Pocahontas story was hilarious propaganda to get stupid rich Britishers to invest in colonialism. &#8220;The old Indians are fools, but the young, fertile mind-slut Native Americans can be seduced (raped).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Yarbles</title>
		<link>http://exiledonline.com/geithner-lifts-ass-for-chinese-masters/comment-page-1/#comment-7199</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Yarbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 01:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exiledonline.com/?p=9369#comment-7199</guid>
		<description>The Chinese leadership knew their purchasing of dollar denominated investments wouldn&#039;t pay off financially. TG opening up his bunghole (as pointed out a bunghole already deeply penetrated by huge bankers) is just gravy to the Chinese to keep things flowing a little longer.

The real payoff for China is the propping up of their export market. Using their &#039;comparative advantage&#039; (a fancy bullshit economics term meaning pay shit to your own people and pollute China like crazy) to get western multinationals to make them into a 21st century manufacturing powerhouse is what it&#039;s all about. While it may all blow up in the faces of the Chinese leadership if they can&#039;t keep their people happy or terrified enough, for now it seems to be working. 

The name of the game is to keep the system going for as long as possible. Each day the current system keeps going is another day when the good old U.S. of A. needs the Chinese to wipe its ass a bit more.

In short what China is doing is loaning fat, decadent, lazy, and stupid America the money to buy good from American multinationals which are made in China. This allows China to actually produce what the rest of the world wants while America becomes like H.G. Wells&#039; Eloi.

What was expected by the brain-dead economists: America will own, the rest of the world will work.

What will happen (option 1): America will be decadent Eloi, the rest of the world will feed on them. Or (option 2) maybe the US, realizing it can&#039;t win economically, will go all warlike and just steal what it can&#039;t pay for or make. Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chinese leadership knew their purchasing of dollar denominated investments wouldn&#8217;t pay off financially. TG opening up his bunghole (as pointed out a bunghole already deeply penetrated by huge bankers) is just gravy to the Chinese to keep things flowing a little longer.</p>
<p>The real payoff for China is the propping up of their export market. Using their &#8216;comparative advantage&#8217; (a fancy bullshit economics term meaning pay shit to your own people and pollute China like crazy) to get western multinationals to make them into a 21st century manufacturing powerhouse is what it&#8217;s all about. While it may all blow up in the faces of the Chinese leadership if they can&#8217;t keep their people happy or terrified enough, for now it seems to be working. </p>
<p>The name of the game is to keep the system going for as long as possible. Each day the current system keeps going is another day when the good old U.S. of A. needs the Chinese to wipe its ass a bit more.</p>
<p>In short what China is doing is loaning fat, decadent, lazy, and stupid America the money to buy good from American multinationals which are made in China. This allows China to actually produce what the rest of the world wants while America becomes like H.G. Wells&#8217; Eloi.</p>
<p>What was expected by the brain-dead economists: America will own, the rest of the world will work.</p>
<p>What will happen (option 1): America will be decadent Eloi, the rest of the world will feed on them. Or (option 2) maybe the US, realizing it can&#8217;t win economically, will go all warlike and just steal what it can&#8217;t pay for or make. Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

