nice one prick

Yes, Stalin, wielding enormous power, got ‘money’ from ‘Jews that ran the banks’ to start his Five Year Plans. It’s this way because you believe in it! Glory be!

http://de-construct.net/e-zine/?p=7163

With such classics as Martyrs of Bosnia featuring Ramzi Yousef the first WTC bomber of over 30 greatest hits DVD’s from the Bosnian war featuring torture and executions.

http://de-construct.net/e-zine/?p=7504

The latest release is Juda the sniper in Iraq although it only lasts 30 minutes killing US soldiers.

“A half-hour long film about a Muslim sniper who is killing American soldiers in Iraq is being shown in Bosnia, reports Bosnian Muslim television.
The film is shown in central Bosnia where concentration of radical Islamists is the greatest, reports Bosnian government TV station.

The film is about a mysterious Muslim named Juba who is using a sniper to kill an American soldier once every day. The sniper has been doing this for several years now and each soldier is hit with one bullet in the forehead, the movie shows.

Bosnian TV news show 60 Minutes reports that the mysterious sniper has killed several hundred Americans so far. After each killing, the sniper leaves one shell and a message in Arabic that says “What’s taken by blood cannot be brought back without blood.”

The DVD also says that Bosnian Muslim Jihad veterans from the notorious Bosnian Muslim Army unit El Mujaheed are also volunteers among the Jihadists in Iraq that are killing the Americans.

During the Bosnian civil war in the 1990s, United States blamed and then bombed the Bosnian Serbs who were targets of massacres by the El Mujahedeen units and other Bosnian Muslim government forces.”

http://www.serbianna.com/blogs/newspost/?p=1316

@eric

“Why doesn’t anyone ever make films about Stalin’s gulag, or about Pol Pot, East Timor, etc.”

I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot. I encouraged the Thai to help the Khmer Rouge. The question was how to help the Cambodian people. Pol Pot was an abomination. We could never support him. But China could.
~ Zbigniew Brzezinski, Obamas foreign policy advisor

Who do you think created and ran the Gulag system?

It would be pretty embarrassing if it were common knowledge that the most powerful international western banking firms financed the Bolshevik revolution ( Warburg Germany, Rothschild England, Ashberg Sweden and Schiff London) sending them arms, print and propaganda material, etc and in the case of Trotsky and other Marxist terrorist exiles in New York US passports to enter Russia.

Where do you think Stalin got his money to launch the 5 year industrialisation plan project?

@Ben

The Russian guy who made the Nightwatch films (I didn’t like them but they had good effects for the budget)and directed Wanted I think he is Jewish.

http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/20090824_irresponsible_basterds_mulling_over_tarantinos_wwii_do-over/

Steven Spielberg is a Jew who made a war movie about idealized WASPS played by Tom Hanks and Matt Damon.

I actually like what Tarantino does with Melanie Laurent. She’s a blond, Aryan looking Jew sleeping with a black guy. That’s guaranteed to shortcircuit the Nazi brain from here to Nuremberg. First they’ll find themselves sexually attracted to a Jewish woman, then bang, she’s sleeping with a black guy and killing Nazis.

But I don’t think this movie has much appeal to your typical Bomb Iran and Kill Palestinians Neocon Jew either. There’s no “Purity of Arms” in this movie and the Basterds aren’t exactly “the most moral army in the world”.

Top that off with the Jewish heroine as a suicide bomber (althought Tarantino gets around the thorny problem of whether she was planning to go down in flames herself by having her stalker kill her before she has to make a decision) and it’s not going to be appealing to Alan Dershowitz any more than it’s going to be appealing to David Duke.

Actually no, he wouldn’t have.

A Slavic Nazi is a bit like a white trash American who’s against universal health care.

Disrespect intended toward the Slavic Hitler sympathizers (Hitler would have loved you back) whose ancestors rounded up and killed the Jewish intelligentsia and are angry that the descendants of that intelligentsia now flourish in a land without quotas and cossacks.

Wajda yes, Horthy no.

They don’t come out and say it, but they (a good example would be Saving Private Ryan) do create the illusion that Normandy was a major battle against the Nazis, when in fact the Russians had won the war in 1942 and 1943.

All the Anglo Americans were really doing at Normandy was putting enough troops in place to keep Italy and Greece from going communist.

The biggest contribution the USA made to beating the Nazis was actually getting attacked by the Japanese. Richard Sorge, maybe the greatest spy in history, was able to convince Stalin that Japan was going to attack the United States sometime in 1941. This allowed him to roll the dice and pull his troops out of Siberia and reinforce Moscow.

Not that I want to get into an American Jew vs. Slav cinematic pissing match (although Tarantino would probably approve), but I don’t think I’m quite ready to trade Milos Forman and Andrzej Wajda for “You Don’t Mess with the Zohan”.

When Slavs learn to make movies. Too bad your countries got rid of your Jews; you might have had a film industry too.

But they forget to remind people that the vast majority of World War II movies have been just as unrealistic.

Sure there was a battle on Iwo Jima. But no, it was nothing like the John Wayne movie “The Sands of Iwo Jima”. In fact, William Manchester, the historian and Pacific War vet recalls that when he and his friends saw this film in the theater, they all laughed so hard they were kicked out.

In the case of Inglourious Basterds no, not even Hitler (and he really was one of the stupidest dicators in history) would have been dumb enough to plan a film opening in Paris a few weeks before the whole fucking Anglo American army was about to come rumbling into town. Just for that he deserved to be blown up by a gorgeous Jewish Milkmaid or gunned down by a couple of ugly fuckers from the USA.

BUT, in two ways Inglourious Basterds is a hell of alot more realistic than most war movies.

1.) Brad Pitt’s violent hillybilly is what most soldiers act like, not Tom Hanks idealized liberal icon in Saving Private Ryan.

2.) The vicious war criminal gets away in the end. He’ll have plastic surgery to cover up his swastika and he’ll get to enjoy that house on Nantucket for the next few decades.

So everyone steals something from someone. The most important thing is to make your stuff good. For that reason, I am very very suspicious of Tarantino.

Kill Bill 1 and 2 were sooo bad and long that I am very leery of walking into any Tarantino movie. And that is coming from someone that was practically obsessed with Uma Thurman for 10 years. Thus, far Inglorious Bastards (sorry, bastErds) shows the two main danger signs of Kill Bill: (i) pretentiousness up the ass, and (ii) an artificial set up to make sadism and violence by the main characters “ok”.