Comments on: Jim Cramer Destroyed CNBC Viewers’ Wealth In Just 4 Days

By: URADUMBFUCK

URADUMBFUCK — Thu, 24 Mar 2011 05:31:52 +0000

Wow you’re stupid (MARK AMES). This is a failed attempt to bring down a talented person who has made a lot of people a lot of money. You’re choice of language also reduces your credibility. For example, I just wrote “you’re choice of language” which is the correct way to increase my credibility with Jim Cramer. He and I know English grammar. And we know credibility too. Your not going to understand the proper use of “you’re” because you’re brain can’t handle it. You’re credibility is seriously going down even as your reading this.

By: SA

SA — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:09:25 +0000

Who’s the alternative, for buy and sell alerts, to Cramer? (Please don’t say Don Harrold.)

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:33:55 +0000

My bookie gives better odds than Craner. MSNBC and Cramer make a good team.

By: john galt

john galt — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:21:17 +0000

I have a loan with G.E.M.B., What a bunch of scumbags they are! I am trying to get a group of people to short their stock. I,m going to so maybe I can recoup some of my money they charged in fees! If it digs into Cramers pocket too, all the better!

By: Garret

Garret — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:50:40 +0000

If you bought on Feb 27 at the $8.60 open, and held until today at $12.27, you would be up 42.6% in a month and a half. That translates to a 340% return for the year (assuming no compounding, which would make the returns even better). Also, look at the Dow Jones Industrials on Feb 27. The whole index was tanking. The odds are you could have picked any stock on this day and been way lower 4 days later. To be fair, because of the remarkable turn in the indices, you probably could have picked any number of different stocks and been up 40% over this time period as well.

By: Pequiste

Pequiste — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:55:21 +0000

Oh that Jim Cramer
of CNBC fame r
the lunantic fringe of the market.
He’ll tease you and taunt you
as long as you do view
this idiots shill and shrill bark it.

It’s all for a dollar
So please don’t you holler
if you’ve listened to his swill in re money.
His bosses find reason
to show him all season
cause their government bailout is real funny.

So take it from me
I would much rather be
reading caustic and insight right here.
For this shithead named Cramer is not only to blame R,
’cause you saw him and gave him your ear.

Best shut off the telly
and go fill your belly
while there is occasion my friend.
For the market and Demons
have a plan and it see-ums
to have financial catastrophe as end.

P.S. This asshole’s “Mad Money” is a very bad clown show. He needs only to wear some big shoes, a frilly collar, polka dot baggy jump suit, fluffy buttons and a Bozo red-hair wig. Don’t forget the big red nose! Surely infantile infotainment for a childish audience. Just filler and distraction. Destructive only to those who have that much time to waste on such sewage.
You might as well take your “financial advice” from Kramer from the Seinfeld show.

By: Dakota

Dakota — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:54:09 +0000

Booo-Yaah.

After seeing Cramer bragging of manipulating the market during his daze as a hedge fund manager I can’t believe ANYONE listens to him or that he isn’t met with tomatos everywhere he goes.

Exactly how is Cramer different from Madeoff other than having an hour show on CNBC?

It’s all such a joke, all of it, from the biggest Ponzi scheme in the history of the world, which is still in it’s infancy, to banksters robbing our great-great grandchildren with the threats of too big to fail.

Too bad they’re not too big to jail.

Our so called Representatives that received calls ranging from 300:1 to 100:1 against the bailout have no intentions of arresting their partners in crime, so once again we have taxation without representation.

After my comments, I have a question.

Exactly when did the coup happen?

By: Gordon S. Creek

Gordon S. Creek — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:21:45 +0000

Your graphs and numbers have no correlation.
Go back to Statistics 101, as I suspect
that you have never taken any statistics
course.
Lies, damn lies and statistics,
telling the truth is a much better option.
Your comments are filled with emotionalism
and very little facts or truths.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:07:25 +0000

“the greatest wealth destruction I’ve seen by a President.” Cramer is not a President.

For now, let’s just try and answer this simple question: ”Who destroys your wealth more: Obama or Jim Cramer?”

That’s not a good question because fiat money and the stock market are ponzi schemes along with most of the government programs! Obama with Fed Reserve handed bailout of $12.8 trillion as of March! and not just the $700 billion TARP (that’s just the appetizer).

By: Joseph

Joseph — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:12:47 +0000

I lost a bunch of money on GE last year, but that was before Jim recommended it. I blame that lying “we won’t cut the dividend” POS Jeff Immelt. I hope he gets canned and sued for investor fraud.

On Cramer though, he has made me a ton of money. I bet nearly everything I had left in the IRA on AMD after hearing Cramer recommend it in november (and after doing my homework) and am up around 100% since then, making back nearly all of my losses.

I’m on the fence about fading the gains or being greedy and hanging on now, but one thing is for sure. Sometimes he is right.

By: Tom Dockery

Tom Dockery — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:35:22 +0000

Great.As soon as GE goes bankrupt,Notre Dame will go begging to the Big 10,who will turn them down.

By: H.D. Price

H.D. Price — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:22:36 +0000

There is no difference between the Republicans and Democrats, they are two sides of the same coin. Clinton was nothing more than a moderate Republican, and you can see the same recycled bullshit from Obama (and his recycled cabinet). As for investing on the advice from some clown on TV, who in their right mind would put real money (or Federal Reserve Notes, which is what has passed for real money for a long time now) on what some idiot on the boob tube, whether it’s Suzy Whoreman or Dim Cramer, says? Television is all about entertainmen. As Howard Beale said in Network, “We’re in the boredom killing business!” A fool with “boo ya” and smashing big red buttons for sound effects? And you take financial advice from him? You get what you deserve then.

By: CSI

CSI — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:59:49 +0000

If I have to hear one more time how Jon Stewart “destroyed” Cramer I’m going to puke.

Cramer is a clown little better than morning zoo radio show hosts. Whoever takes him seriously deserves what they get.

He’s to actual investing as Jon Stewart is to actual news, and the people who take them seriously are too dumb to learn anything unless it’s presented to them by a clown honking his nose. The idea of one fraud destroying the other is laughable.

And if you even watched the clip, all Stewart does is basically say, “You should have done something. I don’t know WHAT, but you should have done it.” Just how far can ignorant indignation get someone? According to the clapping seals in the Daily Show audience, pretty far!

By: vvvci

vvvci — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:31:49 +0000

Don’t forget Cramer’s immortal, soon-to-be infamous “Here’s how you use your Hedge-Fund to FLEECE unsuspecting investors” tutorial (video).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5M-OiXUhZNE&feature=related

Cramer’s TheStreet.com has already censored (copyright blocked) this video before. It is a tutorial on how a hedge fund “squeezes” stocks lowere – wiping out “MORON LONGS”, or alternatively pushes stocks artificially higher, UNLOADING them on unsuspecting investors, using (what else) coordinated sales between different traders working for same fund, or, in some cases, taking a $15 million hit to preserve the fund from a far larger dire, “short position.”

Don’t forget where Cramer learned all these tricks from – as Well as BUSH’s Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson, as well as CLINTON’s Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin!

The “new” guy in the White House has STACKED his administration with these crooks! Hell, Giethner’s #2 at Treasury is a blatant _-_ former LOBBYIST!!

Let me save you a dozen weeks of trouble: THOSE GUYS are GROUND ZERO of this economic nightmare, they gloat about bonuses one month, stand in line for bailouts the next, and then DOUBLE DIP on the bailouts from all directions!

By: Jack Boot

Jack Boot — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:08:54 +0000

‘Tis time to revive the traditional penalty for false prophets…

By: `faert noise

`faert noise — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:01:34 +0000

jim cramer suck cock

By: Kelvin Phillips

Kelvin Phillips — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:59:09 +0000

Well, I know for a fact that the Republicans have definitely failed at monetary policy and I am not eager to give them another chance to screw up again. As for those investors…It’s those who game the system and mess it up that people like me have a problem with.

Times have changed. It’s not the publics job to trust Wall Street, it’s Wall Street’s job to earn the public’s trust. And Wall Street doesn’t care.

By: Kramer 2.0

Kramer 2.0 — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:23:57 +0000

Boo.Ya.Ames.

By: Walter

Walter — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:22:49 +0000

It is amazing to me that people can’t think for themselves. Either it’s one or the other. I personally watch CNBC all the time – and I think the people call it there as they see it(most of the time). No one has a crystal ball but people like Cramer I believe are trying to help. He made millions as a hedge-fund manager and can sit at home if he wants. It’s also amazing to me that people are on one side when everything is going so great(weren’t the Dems ooohing and aahing over Clinton when the stock market was going up in the 90s? – going up because of these same bankers/brokers?) – the same as the Reps were defending Bush in his first term against the Clinton recession. It’s laughable to me how much people put in the Dem/Rep. thing and don’t understand that neither side cares about you. they only care about money and power. To think that because we have a new administration that this will change is laughable and something I hope my 10year old wouldn’t believe.
One last point -the Dems may hate the investors but it is the ability of companies to raise money that creates jobs. Without the stock market companies like Google, Amazon and First Solar may never get the money they need to create the thousands of jobs that are needed. The stock market keeps going down because investors have little faith that Obama and Geithner have a plan that will work or even stabilize the financial system. Rightly or wrongly, that is the perception and unless you are going to do away with the stock market and free-market(yes, I know it has its problems) enterprise investors will NOT throw there money into new companies to create new jobs. If they have any left after the stock market crash and Obamas taxes, that is.

By: hudu guru

hudu guru — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:45:29 +0000

Cramer is as Cramer does. CNBC/Cramer shills out info to individual investors, not institutions. Cramer speaks to Joe Lunchpail while Mr. Lunchpail has no idea what’s moving the market other than what Cramer just told him. CNBC is entertainment. Bottom line. Ad revenue, increased veiwer percentage these are the things CNBC/GE are interested in. Cramer is a character. His show might as well be on Saturday mornings after Sponge bob.