Issue #23/48, September 24 - October 8, 1998 |
||||||||||||||||||
|
ANGRY WHITE MAIL Dear Hairball: If encouraged by your reply, I can opine further. If not, I want these broads to think of the following, while driving to the airport one last time (doubtless emitting a vagina fart enroute): Yours, Ms. Lally, is that you? Jean, are you just trying to make us look bad? 'Cuz this has got to be a setup. The eXile would like to state very plainly that it supports and encourages eXhole-eXpatella relationships, that we always have, and that any attempt to paint our editorial stance otherwise is a baldfaced lie. We're not saying that because we're scared of being forced home in the next six months, either. Nuh-uh. We're saying that because, well, we mean it. And by the way, GS, don't bother opining further. You already summed it up with witty precision in that last sentence of yours. GOD SAVE THE TOODLEPIP Dear Exile, As for us Brits, we don't need to sign any bits of paper to tell everyone how totally and utterly significant we are - it's obvious for all to see - but it's nice tto know you lot look up to us Keep up the good work old bean Toodlepip Dear Rob, SAUER GRAPES As bright as you are, you've undoubtedly noticed the artless anti-SBS Agro campaign spotting the pages of MT lately. Derk, in his latest bit of self-aggrandizement, has graciously offered to rescue the frozen salaries of th paper's (already grossly underpaid) Russian employees. His heroism apparently does't stop him from plastering it all over his own publication. But were you aware that now the Westerners at the paper are mutely swallowing a 20% pay cut this month? Payments on the wage arrears look about as likely as they do in the mining industry, and there's no promise of a return to normal next month. And the cutback trend is catching on: one major section (I'll let you guess) is already gone, taking several staff members with it, and further layoffs are a very near possibility. Once-taboo words like "folding" and "insolvency" are becoming common office jargon. In a recent newsroom appearance, Sauer painted the situation in uncharacteristically gloomy terms. I give the whole rickety enterprise until the end of October. That would consign the Moscow Times to the archives as an amatuerish, less-than-ten-year, essentially ineffectual experiment, invoking a shrug at best from disinterested Russia-watchers. Could such a flash-in-the-pan, insignificant operation really have been worthy of all your vitriol - for over a year? As an Ernst&Young acquaintance once surprised me with a singular flash of insight: "Everything they write in the Moscow Times is bullocks anyway." Everyone knows that what is essentially nothing more than a reader for Russian students of English offered about the same quality journalism as your average college newspaper - it even looks the part. How could you ever expect to be taken seriously if your invented arch-rival wasn't? There was a tower worth toppling, though: Independent Media, which sold more ads last year than any media entity in Russia, is now, according to Sauer, facing bankruptcy as its high-paying advertisers run scared. Several publications have already gone under. It is my suspicion that a conglomerate of slick, image-powered glossies - mere lazy replicas of their Western counterparts - never really had an interest in stability. Like the rest of the blood-sucking, carpet-bagger crowd in this city, Derk and his totally out-of-touch ilk shouldn't be too surprised when their ill-targeted efforts fall short of the mark. Doomed from the outset - true - but is it just an advertising problem? Or fatally insufficient market research? An interested party, Dear Black, |