Joel B. Pollak, Teafailure: Be careful, he might use a proxy on you!
Urgent update, folks! Andrew Breitbart’s Koch-monkey, Joel B. Pollak, just outdid himself as the top ace gumshoe reporter of the retarded-right. Yes folks, Joel. B. Pollak, peddler of the “Johnny Chen Conspiracy Theory” that changed the face of journalism as we know it, now has another shocking scoop about eXiled editor Mark Ames–and to get the scoop, he even used what hi-tech futuristic types call a “proxy.” Yep, betcha you never heard of a “proxy” before, but that’s because you’re not an ace reporter like Joel B. Pollak. But don’t take it from me, take it from the shocking “UPDATE” posted by Joel B. Pollak himself:
UPDATE: Ames responded on August 30 in a rambling ad hominem attack that made no effort to dispute the claims made in the article above. Indeed, its basic factual errors–e.g. my graduation date, easily checked–reinforce Ames’s sloppy reputation.**[see below–Exiled Editor]
In addition, Many of the comments on Ames’s article appear to have been written by Ames himself. We were able to establish, through the use of a proxy, that he edits comments to distort their meaning.
Original comment:
After Ames’s edit:
One commenter–perhaps Ames himself–points out that FCC regulations on profanity apply to broadcast media, not cable. Since neither Ames nor his sockpuppets raise any other factual contentions, it is reasonable to conclude he admits all other facts and conclusions above.
It’s all over, folks. You can’t pull the wool over Joel B. Pollak’s eyes, nosirree! So long as Joel B. Pollak has access to this super-duper hi-tech “proxy” technology, I’m doomed. Resistance is futile, earthlings!
And all along I was wondering what Joel B. Pollak learned at Harvard Law School. Now we know, folks: Joel B. Pollak spent those three years at Harvard figuring out how to use a “proxy.” And with such devastating results!
By Joel B. Pollak’s own “UPDATE” we learn how he deployed this futuristic hi-tech weapon that they call a “proxy” to crack the second-greatest mystery of our time (after the great Johnny Chen Conspiracy, which Joel B. Pollak already solved): Does the Almighty eXiled Moderator improve retarded comments? I mean sure, we make it plain and clear to every mongoloid inbred or Koch-sucking troll who comes onto our site that all comments can and will be subject to IQ-improvement by The Almighty Exiled Moderator… but folks, that didn’t stop ace cub reporter Joel B. Pollak from putting on his cub-reporter’s hat and going undercover, deploying his hi-tech super-futuristic “Proxy” to break open the truth about The eXiled Moderator.
Here, for posterity, is a screen-shot of Joel B. Pollak’s second-greatest scoop in his entire failed life:
In case I haven’t made this clear enough, I just want to say: “Thank you, Joel B. Pollak. Thank you for being so unintentionally hilarious. Thank you for playing the role of knucklehead-villain so perfectly. Thank you for being you: For doing that voodoo that you screw-up so well.”
While it’s true that you may wind up getting fired by Master Koch for screwing up this half-baked PR campaign to salvage Master Koch’s reputation, just know that we little folk appreciate your art. True, you might get laughed out of that rank Island O’ Misfits you inhabit over at BigGovernment. But to me, you’ll always just be Joel B. Pollak, “Mr. Proxy,” the Performance Artist extraordinaire who kept America tickled pink through hard economic times.
Joel B. Pollak, keep the comedy rolling, baby!
** = Reader informs us that Joel B. Pollak graduated from Harvard undergrad in 1999, and graduated from Harvard Law School some other year. We would take the time to correct this… but sadly, we can’t be bothered.
Would you like to know more? Read more about Joel B. Pollak, Breitbart’s Koch-monkey: ANDREW BREITBART ATTACKS EXILED EDITOR MARK AMES!…HIRES FAILED TEABAG REPUBLICAN TO INVESTIGATE THE GREAT “WHO IS JOHNNY CHEN?” CONSPIRACY. For more background, read “Jim Goad and Gavin McInnes Beg Mark Ames: ‘Answer Me, Please?’” Also read “KKKat Fight! White Power Fashionista John Galliano VS. White Power Fashionista Gavin McInnes.”
Read more: andrew breitbart, breitbart, joel b. pollak, joel pollak, johnny chen, koch, oligarchy, proxy, retard, Mark Ames, Koch Whores, Libertards
Got something to say to us? Then send us a letter.
Want us to stick around? Donate to The eXiled.
Twitter twerps can follow us at twitter.com/exiledonline
79 Comments
Add your own1. Hamsterfist | September 5th, 2011 at 5:53 pm
Why is it that the “freedom loving” right wing always make it hard to comment on their websites or immediately scrub all the real comments that destroy credibility? Why exactly are they using Nazi tactics, yet attack you for humorizing some of the retarded comments? (Maybe I can get the treat just because!) Also, why do they say the Koch Brothers conspiracy is ludicrious and in the same breath villify Soros for funding the left? The question remains, exactly how stupid are these people?
2. rick | September 5th, 2011 at 6:12 pm
It’s–it’s kind of like wrestling a pig, arguing with that sort of opponent. The–the pig just likes it.
3. Flatulissimo | September 5th, 2011 at 6:22 pm
I personally love the idea of attempting to “smear” Ames with the contents of his own writing – that he published himself in his own paper! Hilarious. They can’t wrap their heads around the concept that Ames isn’t running for office and doesn’t give a shit about how he might play to family values fucktards.
I also love the moderated comments on here, I wish they’d do that on every site when the Koch trolls flood the comment sections with bullshit free market talking points. But no, they have to take the high road, print the idiotic comments, and then the noble lefties try to post responses as though they were worthy of the effort. I tire of progressives icky earnestness, it’s like a Hootie and the Blowfish song or something. The eXiled better suits my style.
Dammit, wait ’til I get paid and I’ll be making another paltry donation.
4. Shade | September 5th, 2011 at 7:51 pm
Poor right-wingers, they’re just so frustrated! All they wanna do is suck them some nice superior billionaire dick, but that’s what said billionaires hire the pricey call girls for… So the pissed off right-wingers try to take it out on the rest of us… Hey, here’s a marketing idea: an inflatable billionaire, complete with action fly and a nice, well-lubed cock for these teatards to suck on! It’s the perfect pacifier to keep these overgrown babies quiet…
5. EngineeringSocialist | September 5th, 2011 at 7:55 pm
“Ames responded on August 30 in a rambling ad hominem attack that made no effort to dispute the claims made in the article above.”
First of all, what the fuck was your original article? You spent a short bit in the beginning crediting them for the Koch revelations, and the rest of it making what was ultimately a sad, pathetic attempt to discredit Ames.
Also, I love how he thinks his shit was worth responding to in the first place. I’m with #3 above; I get enough of their stupidity elsewhere, so thank you Almighty eXiled Moderator for at least keeping it out of here. Let my insignificant subscription help keep this space alive.
6. robotslave | September 5th, 2011 at 8:00 pm
So, if I’m reading this right, Pollak tried to post multiple comments here supporting himself, using proxies to anonymize them, then gets so mad when they’re edited that he inadvertently confesses to making fake fan-comments in the first place?
I’m sure he’s got another explanation, of course– and I’m just a sure that his fans will love it.
7. Gustavo Arellano | September 5th, 2011 at 8:13 pm
I don’t know how many of Breitbart’s losers comment here, but I’m hoping a lot so you can mess them all up and have them supporting same-sex marriage and other shit that’ll have them crying to Big Daddy Breitbart. ALL HAIL AMES.
8. Roke | September 5th, 2011 at 8:21 pm
It’s funny to see the republican discrediting template invoked against someone who isn’t retarded. Cause the republican will always say “you did X,” in a hurt and shocked tone. And by simply not engaging on their terms, and implicitly backing up their accusation, you win the confrontation.
Since Ames didn’t engage with them, they can only resort to their nerdy roots and say “he did not follow the rules~!~!~!~!” And will just repeat that over and over, convincing themselves that they’ve shown the world what a bad rule breaker you are
9. septimius severus | September 5th, 2011 at 8:30 pm
ah, yes, may the eXile deathstar focus the death ray on those twats! It makes me laugh, these rightards trying to pretend like they are fact-checkin’, fair playin’ amuricans, when in fact they are the most sorry-assed, cowardly, snivelling, dirty playing little stalinists trying to subvert all that is decent
10. Mr. Bad | September 5th, 2011 at 8:51 pm
Brofist O Almight Exiled Censor, this is an eye opener, if you have indeed been improving my moronic asides, I a fagot. I will send more money, keep up the good work, you’ve earned a pissant’s respect.
11. matt | September 5th, 2011 at 9:02 pm
oh christ ames. Please, please will you just go ahead and go Thomas Nolle on this dildo. Jesus if you read the shit that Breitbart and his acolytes pulled off…that they continue to pull off (http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7725), with virtually no consequences…
Just…a few months in min security prison for O’Keefe, and a big ass paycheck for Breitbart. Some pizzas they didn’t order would be a slap on the wrist.
12. iCONOCLAST | September 5th, 2011 at 9:03 pm
To be honest, I’d kind of prefer it if the censor showed the original message every now and then (barring of course, the really obvious trolls). Genuine self-righteousness is sometimes interesting to read BUT NOTHING IS MORE INTERESTING TO READ than the censor.
13. matt | September 5th, 2011 at 9:04 pm
Shit.
Hey, almighty moderators, that second Breitbart was supposed to have a ? after it.
If you would be so kind 🙂
14. ☭ mouse ☭ | September 5th, 2011 at 9:30 pm
Tell this Pollack asshole its called humor enhancement ! its like refining fissile material out of bullshit comment ore
15. ☭ mouse ☭ | September 5th, 2011 at 9:36 pm
Also, this guy has seriously the most fucking punchable face in history
16. borkt | September 5th, 2011 at 10:10 pm
I knew a guy who looked like him, total douche. This guy has the intelligence of a politician, it amazes me that he didn’t get elected.
17. Adrian | September 5th, 2011 at 10:38 pm
These flame wars are really cool and all, but have you ever considered having children? There’s at least $20 in it for you. Because that, folks–Ames raising a child in America–would offer something truly insightful and sublime. It would be a great follow-up to Going Postal.
18. Anathame | September 5th, 2011 at 10:41 pm
I’m not a fan of Ames, but I generally agree with him.
That being said, I hope you wreck this guy. He looks like an American Pie extra.
19. Pastor Dick | September 5th, 2011 at 11:05 pm
And what the hell is an gumshoe cub-reporter doing leaving anonymous comments on blogs to hype up his own work?
I wonder how many comments on his articles are manifestations of his multiple personality disorder– he DOES know how to use a proxy after all!
卐WIR WERDEN SIEGER– DURCH UNSEREN ZENSUR!卐
20. foog | September 6th, 2011 at 12:17 am
I remember getting “improved” by the moderators once. Can’t for the life of me recall what the specific comment was about, but I remember getting right pissed off at being mis-characterised so childishly and heavy-handedly.I even wrote another comment assplaining myself …which of course got fucked with as well. The whole thing was more frustrating than I could possibly convey. Such an incredibly childish technique and sooooo fucking effective in spite of (because of?) it!
Of course, none of it could put the slightest dent in my abiding love for the Exile(d). Sure is hella funnier when it happens to someone else though. (odd that)
21. Thomzas | September 6th, 2011 at 12:28 am
I bet the real reason they’re after you is that you hurt O’Keefe’s feelings.
Perhaps a handy addition to the website would be a new page where all your articles about Big Government’s Freaky Circus Family are placed together for convenience.
I’d kill to see an Exiled style biog on each of them too.
22. bulfinch | September 6th, 2011 at 1:05 am
Mark — thanks for caring enough to keep on punching – even if it is most often below your weight.
23. Jie ke | September 6th, 2011 at 5:03 am
lol@12 getting improved
24. helplesscase | September 6th, 2011 at 8:14 am
Pollak’s trying to play it cool, but you know he’s slow-burning like crazy about all this. What a yutz.
25. noodle | September 6th, 2011 at 8:23 am
Better watch out, Ames. Next time he might use 7 of them.
26. Paul | September 6th, 2011 at 8:25 am
This warrants an Ames/Taibi reunion, strawberry pie anyone?
27. Paul | September 6th, 2011 at 8:26 am
Plus he already looks like a horse…
28. T | September 6th, 2011 at 9:30 am
“Why is it that the “freedom loving” right wing always make it hard to comment on their websites or immediately scrub all the real comments that destroy credibility? Why exactly are they using Nazi tactics, yet attack you for humorizing some of the retarded comments?”
If only the quoted commenter knew the truth, man. The truth! But you see the guvment, and the Jews, they’ll never let the truth out. No, man, but I have the truth. But the Exiled Moderator, which is an agent of Mossad and the guvment, won’t let the trufe out.
Hold on a second here, my uncle Jethro wants me to suck on his lollipop again. It’s tough being an inbred, i tell ya!
Mark Ames is an anti-authoritarian gonzo journalist. But no one is more than Mark Ames.
What is what is the most.
Oh, yeah, the “moderator” is having fun by upping the IQ (censoring) comments. Censorship is censorship, and WAAAAHAHAHHHHAHH if you were a real reporter you’d lay your articles vulnerable to all WAAAAAHHHHHAHHHA opposing views. If your reporting truly cut deeper and broadened the essential contexts, then WAAAAAHHHHAHHHAH any criticism would be easily WWWAHHHHAHAHHAHHAH dismantled out in the open.
What a fucking god. Wait, maybe “god” isn’t giving you enough credit for your genius.
Oh, and I give a shit about this getting creatively “moderated”. This is more like a personal fanmail. To the guy who wrote this:
http://exiledonline.com/jim-goad-begs-mark-ames-answer-me-please-jim-goads-mother-responds-in-an-exiled-exclusive/
29. rosie | September 6th, 2011 at 9:41 am
Oh God Ames! Moderate me! Edit me! IMPROVE ME BABY!!! YEAH! DON’T STOP!
check this out: http://exiledonline.com/jim-goad-begs-mark-ames-answer-me-please-jim-goads-mother-responds-in-an-exiled-exclusive/
30. hon kee mufo | September 6th, 2011 at 9:44 am
I am deeply honored by the allegation that my words may actually have been those of Mark Ames, even if it is untrue.
31. Yo! | September 6th, 2011 at 9:52 am
I think the correct term for the Koch-brothers would be “Massa Koch” not “Master Koch”
This Pollack guy seems to do just about anything for them Kochs.
32. Morbo | September 6th, 2011 at 10:47 am
Proxies do not work that way! Good night!
33. maus | September 6th, 2011 at 11:42 am
ha ha ha ha like Breitbart or any other trash conservative blowhard believes in full “free speech” in their comments box. the sanctimony is strong with this constant loser.
how do you pay your law-school loans not as a lawyer, not as a journalist, but as a blogger? are you, Joel B. Pollak, cub reporter for the Daily Asshole, living with your parents like fellow unemployed layabout “muckraker” James O’Keefe? do you take the same PUA classes that he does?
34. swr | September 6th, 2011 at 11:49 am
What does he mean by “establish through the use of a proxy?”
I don’t see what his using a proxy to mask his real IP while browsing or commenting on The Exiled would have to do his noticing Ames’ edits of readers’ comments.
35. Al Gore | September 6th, 2011 at 11:50 am
damn, choice futurama reference out of nowhere
36. swr | September 6th, 2011 at 11:54 am
Just to add to that, most news sites edit readers comments all the time.
If I go to the comments under any Yahoo News article, for example, and write “fuck this shit,” my comment will be edited.
It will come out as something like “*&*# this s**98t” because the Yahoo software censors profanity.
But if I go to that same Yahoo News comments section and write something like “blacks should be sent back into slavery and the Jews did 9/11 Doctor Paul says so” my comment will probably stand as posted.
Yahoo censors profanity but not racism.
37. Phil | September 6th, 2011 at 12:29 pm
Why don’t we call these idiots what they are: Koch-heads?
38. deebocools | September 6th, 2011 at 12:46 pm
This is the only website I actally read the comments section on, because I get a few laughs out of it, and insightful comments are usually left intact.
Try reading the “comments” on any unmoderated site. Nauseating.
39. CB | September 6th, 2011 at 12:58 pm
@ 34
Yeah, I’m wondering that, too. Where exactly does Pollak establish that he knows what a proxy is? I guess it establishes that he’s familiar with the word, and maybe knows how to find and use one, but it sounds like he has no damn clue what a proxy actually is and is just using it as a piece of techno-babble to make his ace reporting sound more amazing to people even more clueless about computers than he.
Given that, he should have just gone for full-on nonsense kitsch value and said he’d discovered the Exiled edits posts after “hacking the Gibson”.
40. Comrade V3 | September 6th, 2011 at 1:08 pm
@36,
(Trolling protip) For all your by passing automated censoring needs: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_hyphen
41. Dom | September 6th, 2011 at 1:52 pm
“Also, this guy has seriously the most fucking punchable face in history”
Second that.
Ames has so far posted FOUR photos of that fucking face & my junk DNA meter is off the scale.
42. CynicalMofo | September 6th, 2011 at 2:20 pm
Hmmm…. Why would he use a proxy in the first place… I don’t know if he really knows what a proxy is… but he definitely knows what a sockpuppet is… Which is probably where he learned about proxies in the first place… It’s definitely hilarious how he (intentionally/unintentially, who knows with these idiots)outs himself as a sockpuppeteer, and then goes on to accuse the Mods of the same for moderating his obvious trolling/sockpuppeteering.
No respect for the intelligence of his readers… which is what they deserve anyways…
43. Damn Red | September 6th, 2011 at 2:21 pm
Wait,
I read that and he used your own writing to smear you? And he even goes out to mention in the first line that the Russian government shut you down, I think he wants our government to follow their example comrades.
Honestly I just think these morons hate it when they see some spark of life left, or is this writing an example of pants shitting fear on his part, Ames have you considered medication?
44. CynicalMofo | September 6th, 2011 at 2:56 pm
Hehehe…. Exiled should compare the IP address that he used via proxy to post and compare it to the lists of compromised PCs that Spamhaus and other orgs put out. Don’t think he is smart/stupid enough to use a botnet proxy, but if his trolling ass did, you could really ream this sanctimonious asshole a new one… either you or the nice people at the federal pen anyways…
45. Shade | September 6th, 2011 at 4:07 pm
Actually, I think punching this pollack guy would be a waste of effort; he looks like he’s already been dickslapped into dopiness a long time ago. He probably wouldn’t feel a punch much. I would say a good kick to the nads might be a better bet, but he probably wouldn’t feel that either. He has that eternally soulless look of one who’s lost all kind of feeling, including (especially?) his gag reflex….
46. Pollack Facepunching Urge Explained | September 6th, 2011 at 4:22 pm
The various photos of Joel B. Pollack we’ve been subjected to this past week reminded me of something, but I couldn’t quite place it. Just made my skin crawl.
But just now I read the phrase “top ace gumshoe” and thought to myself, “heh, that sounds like the title of a Hong Kong action-comedy from the eighties.”
Then it clicked — if you’ve seen some east asian pop cinema from the 70s-90s then you’ve seen plenty of smug, weedy white guys playing villains in those flicks. That’s exactly what he looks like! Maybe that’s why so many of us have an almost instinctual impulse to punch him in the face.
He’s one of the bad guys from an early Jackie Chan movie. One of the nerdy ones that can’t even throw a punch. So you can breathe easy, folks– in the third reel he’ll get thrown off of catwalk into a vat of black-market pharmaceuticals and Uncle’s noodle shop will be saved!
47. One-eyed Jesus muffin | September 6th, 2011 at 4:35 pm
Look at the perfect contours of Pollak’s head.
It’d be a waste if the man wasn’t a human buttplug.
48. maus | September 6th, 2011 at 5:15 pm
@43: Anything other than complete submission makes them uneasy. I wouldn’t say “scared”, but they apparently don’t know how to handle it, or have any contextual retort. It’s just the same attacks as before, and it makes them look toothless and weak.
Of course, the American left tries to coddle the weak, syphilitic media and loses every time.
49. swr | September 6th, 2011 at 6:20 pm
The various photos of Joel B. Pollack we’ve been subjected to this past week reminded me of something,
He looks a little like The Kurgan from the first Highlander movie, only without any of The Kurgan’s redeeming masculine brutality.
Add to that the fact that his teeth look like false teeth and his face has the stiffness of an old man, not the look of a thirty something, and we have our creepiness factor explained.
50. rick | September 6th, 2011 at 6:31 pm
jim goad here. Just wanted to say I hope everyone checked me out with this article here:
http://bit.ly/gEbcKi
51. William Davis | September 6th, 2011 at 8:08 pm
Joel B. Pollack is really handsome. I love his masculine chin and sexy……eyes…… And he’s not a complete failure or a loser at all……. He completely exposed Mark Ames and his henchman Johnny Chen for the Marxist mainstream media Nazis that they are….
P.s.
Please don’t edit me via “proxy”. Our Big Government friends will expose you
52. vortexgods | September 6th, 2011 at 8:13 pm
You know, if they are checking comments, I hope they saw that one I wrote about how they need to be vivisected.
53. darthfader | September 6th, 2011 at 9:26 pm
So it wasn’t just a comment – it was a comment trying to defend his story from the mean ol’ eXile?
Breitbart must fucking hate you, Joel.
54. Derp | September 6th, 2011 at 9:53 pm
Derp derp! Why you gotta pick on Joel B. Pollak? He has feelings and you just keep on hurting them…. you keep hurting him and hurting him…. Leave Joel Pollak alone…. he was one of the only Koch-suckers to lose in 2010…. have you no shame? LEAVE HIM ALONE! JUST…. LEAVE HIM ALONE!
DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRP!
55. Spick and Spam | September 6th, 2011 at 10:13 pm
Polack is lying. His daddy’s site says that he graduated in 1999. So, he is lying when he says that Ames is lying.
http://biggovernment.com/author/jpollak/
56. Rockstar | September 7th, 2011 at 1:11 am
Given how thorough the original breitbart/pollak takedown was, I feel that this posting is only beating a dead horse.
However I found this comment from robotslave interesting: “So, if I’m reading this right, Pollak tried to post multiple comments here supporting himself, using proxies to anonymize them, then gets so mad when they’re edited that he inadvertently confesses to making fake fan-comments in the first place?” …because it implies that Pollak does know what a proxy is, which, despite the headline, is not something that I had anticipated.
57. Edmund Dorkey | September 7th, 2011 at 5:44 am
Pollack’s wifey is ooh la la, brown sugar: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByAIUOmQzeM
Horse Face, not so much.
– Edmund Dorkey, Turks & Caicos Islands
58. AMY ALKON | September 7th, 2011 at 8:36 am
MY NAME IS AMY ALKON AND I’M VERY UPSET, MR. AMES, THAT YOU WOULD CALL ME ABUSIVE NAMES LIKE “RAPE TARD.” DID YOU KNOW THAT MY TSA ABUSER PUT HER FINGERS IN MY CROTCH AND THEN INTO MY VAGINA, BETWEEN MY LABIA? BETWEEN MY LABIA! MY LABIA! MY VAGINAL LIPS. SHE PUT HER FINGERS THERE… OHHHHHHHH
59. AMY ALKON | September 7th, 2011 at 8:43 am
MR. AMES I AM NOT SOME KIND OF LIBERTARIAN AGENT. YOU KNOW, JUST BECAUSE I APPEARED SEVERAL MONTHS AGO WITH THE LIBERTARIAN CATO INSTITUTE AND SOME OBSCURE LIBERTARD CAMPUS GROUP DOES NOT MEAN I HAVE POLITICAL MOTIVATIONS. NO, I AM NOT LIKE MEG MCCLAIN, NOT ONE BIT. I WAS HEINOUSLY VIOLATED BY A GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE AND NO ONE CARES. I WOULD AT LEAST HOPE THAT SOMEONE LIKE YOU, SOMEONE FROM A HORRIBLE COUNTRY LIKE RUSSIA, WHERE HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ARE EXTREMELY COMMON, COULD AT LEAST SYMPATHIZE WITH SOMEONE WHO HAD FINGERS STUFFED INTO HER CROTCH AREA. INTO HER VAGINA! BETWEEN HER LABIA!! LABIA!! OHHHHHH
60. AMY ALKON | September 7th, 2011 at 8:46 am
(NOTICE MR. AMES HOW I’M HERE ON A SWEDISH PROXY. THEY TEACH US HOW TO USE THE SWEDISH PROXIES AT THE LIBERTARIAN CATO INSTITUTE, JUST ASK MR. ELECTRONIQUE JULIAN SANCHEZ.. BOY I HATE THAT GLIB PIECE OF SHIT BAHHHHHHH)
61. One-eyed Jesus muffin | September 7th, 2011 at 9:01 am
Can you get AIDS from staring at Julia Pollak’s picture?
62. Edmund Dorkey | September 7th, 2011 at 12:03 pm
@61/One-eyed Jesus muffin
The short answer is no, you will not get AIDS; however, if you stare at Julia Pollak, if you stare at her for too long, you will end up looking like poor Joel, which means that you will never get laid again for the remainder of your earthly existence.
-Edmund Dorkey
Turks & Caicos Islands
63. Jose | September 7th, 2011 at 1:31 pm
@57 A Jew and a black? Part of the Tea Party? Stupidity has no bounds.
64. Damn Red | September 7th, 2011 at 2:11 pm
@48
Wait there is an actually left leaning party in the US.
65. Comrade V3 | September 7th, 2011 at 3:45 pm
64. Damn Red
“Wait there is an actually left leaning party in the US.”
I dunno @48 has in mind, but I am all in favor of the Nightmare Communism Party.
66. Tyler | September 7th, 2011 at 5:15 pm
The exile does sensor their retarded viewers comments who can’t spell “censor.”
By the way 1+1 = 1
67. Damn Red | September 7th, 2011 at 7:45 pm
@65 Did someone save some left over spooge of Filppo Marinetti insert it into a female gibbon and left the resulting offspring to be raise by the married clones Hitler and Stalin and then gave it a blog?
68. Comrade V3 | September 7th, 2011 at 8:23 pm
I hope so.
69. John B. Polesmoker | September 7th, 2011 at 9:39 pm
Guys, where does Pollack live? Post that bitch’s address so we can go proxy on his ass. I’m talking about some real medieval Gary Brecher style proxy shit.
70. swr | September 8th, 2011 at 5:00 am
A Jew and a black? Part of the Tea Party? Stupidity has no bounds.
I am, unfortunately, a Protestant white male.
But if I were Jewish or black, I’d be on that Koch money like Barack Obama on a chance to surrender.
Hell, if I were a black male, I’d have a “No Mosque at Ground Zero Protect Liberty Kick Out all the Mexicans” website up right now to support my run for president as a “libetarian.”
If I were a black woman? My value as a token wingnut would be so high I’d demand a house in Greenwich and a private Jet.
But alas, although I’m a liberal, my ugly small dicked, male patterned baldness, pasty faced white ass looks like half the people with teabags hanging from their hats and waiving mispelled signs.
71. Jetto Jagga | September 8th, 2011 at 1:27 pm
A failed Teabagger playing at cargo cult journalism. You can dress it up to look like the real thing, but Pollak’s whole update still boils down to the embarrassing “proxy” “scoop.”
72. maus | September 8th, 2011 at 4:26 pm
“A failed Teabagger playing at cargo cult journalism.”
There isn’t much of any other kind, these days.
73. Damn Red | September 8th, 2011 at 4:30 pm
damnit, I have some basic grammar mistakes in my post couldn’t you edit it.
I would consider it a service.
74. Ashcroft | September 9th, 2011 at 5:16 am
This is almost a perfect Tea Party set piece. Their eager young astroturfer Joel B. Pollak gets busted sockpuppeting exiled, but his sockpuppet post was moderated and this shows the boundless evil of Mark Ames, not the spinelessness of Joel Pollack?
And how funny that he fails to note that while anyone is free to comment on exiled, visitors can’t post on big government in a like manner. Which, of course gives Pollack no real grounds to criticise mod policy here, but then, he knows that. He knows it well. His idiot readership probably wouldn’t stop and think on it. I call it 2 nil to Ames.
75. maus | September 9th, 2011 at 7:43 am
“his sockpuppet post was moderated and this shows the boundless evil of Mark Ames, not the spinelessness of Joel Pollack?”
Yeah, in their heads-
“CENSORSHIP??!? WHAT IS THIS, COMMUNIST CHINA?!!! THESE LIB’RULS DON’T RESPECT THE CONSTITUSHUN!!!!”
and Breitbart farts on cue, they all have a group chuckle.
76. Jetto Jagga | September 9th, 2011 at 12:45 pm
Haha, comment from LA Fishbowl: “[Ames is] just following Alinsky’s Golden Rule of Ridicule, and for the easily fooled team players on his “side,” that suffices. Because the “cause” is perceived as righteous, it doesn’t matter if you’re a shitty reporter or a liar. But being an evasive punk won’t stop this effeminate butterfly from slowly getting pinned to a board.”
Talk about attacking on your own weakness.
And now Ames is an “effeminate butterfly.” I thought he was a degenerate rapist, but I guess queer baiting’s easier than keeping up the aggrieved moralist facade.
77. Mike C. | September 9th, 2011 at 2:21 pm
Sorta makes you question the legitimacy of hardline grassroots libertarian (e.g. rich asshole) support. On the one hand you have the tricorn meat-shields that the on-message speakers try to drown out — because they’re shouting that Obama is a socialist and hybrid lizard-man.
On the other, you have rudimentarily functional people, who aren’t on the dole, and they’re mostly moderates that don’t like taxes, because they think Hampster & Sons Sheet Metal, Inc., is going to hit a higher bracket any minute now.
All the real juicy suck jobs are performed by obsequious Renfields on the rich asshole payroll.
78. Cedrick | September 13th, 2011 at 6:34 pm
I knew Goad said he was coming from every conceivable angle, but who could have forseen this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAlEVg0BlW8
79. DeeboCools | September 16th, 2011 at 3:29 pm
It’s so funny that Gavin McInnes is coming out with a book soon pretending that he “fought” skinheads when he was younger, when the New York Times already labeled Gavin a “white supremacist.” Read all about it here:
http://bit.ly/gEbcKi
Leave a Comment
(Open to all. Comments can and will be censored at whim and without warning.)
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed