Vanity Fair profiles The eXile: "Gutsy...visceral...serious journalism...abusive, defamatory...poignant...paranoid...and right!"
MSNBC: Mark Ames and Yasha Levine
Broke the Koch Brothers' Takeover of America
eXile Classic / The War Nerd / August 14, 2013
By Gary Brecher


FRESNO, CA — Name a country that lost at least two thirds of its male population fighting three countries at once, and nearly managed to beat all three before being ground down and damn near wiped out. Second clue: this happened during the second-bloodiest war ever fought in the Western Hemisphere.

Whatever country you nominated, I bet it wasn’t Paraguay during the War of the Triple Alliance, 1864-1870. To most war buffs the War of the Triple Alliance rates a big shrug, and Paraguay is more like a punchline than a country, a tiny landlocked South American sweatbox full of Nazi escapees creaking around cursing arthritis and the T-34. Paraguay is like a country by Mel Brooks.

But Paraguay is the correct answer, and I’m here to give the place its long overdue due. By the way, if you’re wondering what the first-bloodiest war in the Americas was, shame on you! Blue and Gray ring any bells? Gettysburg? America’s still got #1 all locked up, thanks to the Civil War, just possibly the greatest war ever. More than 600,000 dead, and most of them soldiers who died honorably, in open battle. Until you’ve been studying real war for a few years, you don’t realize how rare that kind of high, clean body count is. Like I’ve said before, most conflict is massacre and counter-massacre. Battles are rare.

And that reminds me, I have to quibble with these rankings, even though I feel dirty saying anything that could lower the ranking of our Civil War. What worries me is nobody seems to count the Spanish-vs-Aztec or Spanish-vs-Inca wars in the rankings. Nobody’s very sure how many people died in Mexico, but the simplest answer is “Most of ’em,” and since the Inca have been fighting the Spanish for 500 years at last count, they deserve an entry in the numbers game too.

But let’s say we rule out those conquistador wars, and stick to more standard nation-vs-nation fights; you still have to wonder why this amazing War of the Triple Alliance doesn’t get any publicity. Basically the answer is because the whole thing is a downer. The countries that fought it are downers: Who wants to think about Argentina if they don’t have to? And Uruguay, I had to do a report on Uruguay in fifth grade, picked it because nobody else was going to, started out rooting for it as El Underdog, but by the end I decided it deserved to be just Uruguay. I mean, being a suburb of Argentina, the East St. Louis to Buenos Aires—what could be more pathetic? If only I’d picked the other Guay! Then I’d have changed my whole take on the continent a lot sooner.

Then there’s the fact that it was a real stupid war. One of the best accounts of the whole thing is titled “El Guerro el Mas Stupido.” Which is why I’m not going to waste much time on how it got started. The official reason is that Brazil and Argentina were messing with Uruguayan politics and when the Uruguayan minority party, the Blancos, asked their Paraguay comrades upriver for help, and Paraguay was too macho to say no. The real reason it got started is a lot simpler: because 19th-century nations pumped more testosterone than all the steroid casualties at your gym put together, and when dudes like that spent money on cute Zouave uniforms and horses (cavalry was incredibly expensive) and flags, they wanted their money’s worth. 19th-century war junkies—and that was every man who could read in those better days—weren’t as lame as us 21st-century. taxpayers who don’t even demand that SAC vaporize Tehran just so we can see that those H-bombs we paid for actually work. Your average Victorian newspaper junkie wanted flowery detailed battle reports about their friends and relatives getting filled full of glorious grapeshot. And plenty of illustrations of hussars being shot out of the saddle. It’s the same answer as the old joke about why dogs lick their own balls: “Because they can.”

Then there’s the crummy timing. It’s hard for any American to focus on some foreign war that started in 1864. We have our own war, maybe the best ever, to study up on.

But credit where it’s due, boys: Paraguay, of all people, took on Brazil and Uruguay, then Argentina, and kicked all their asses until it lost a big naval battle—which you can forgive pretty easily when you consider that Paraguay has no coastline. That’s the one thing it has in common with my other favorite South American country, Bolivia. Losing its coast broke Bolivia’s big oxygen-rich high-altitude heart, but Paraguay had it worse: never had a coastline to begin with. Bolivia moans “Queremos nuestro mar”; Paraguay goes, “Cual mar?” It’s jammed like a fat tampon way up the estuary of the Rio de la Plata, and all it has to float around on is a big dirty jungle river, the Parana.

The one good thing about not having a coast is you can keep to yourself, get all weird, and from the start Paraguay rolled with the isolation, went with it big-time. To reach the place you had to cross disgusting malaria swamps or deserts or jungles with spiders the size of laptops, or all of the above. So it was a unique breed of Spaniard who came calling on the Guarani, the big Indian tribe in those parts. They were Jesuits, genuine religious fanatics, and right from the start they decided their little commune was going to be different from the get-rich-quick strip mines their conquistador pals had set up in the rest of Latin America.

For generations these Jesuits ran Paraguay like one of Oprah’s charity schools, only bigger and without the horny dyke teachers buying sex from the pupils. No whips, no mass burnings, none of what your average conquistador considered good healthy fun. The Jesuits in those days were a hardcore outfit, like commissars in the 1930s, and they tried like hell to turn the Guarani into a country of pious, obedient little nation-state builders: gave them universal education, everything owned in common (some kind of Catholic communism, an idea I don’t get at all) and all that “respect for local customs” business that got popular a couple hundred years later. By the time the Jesuits got booted out of Paraguay by the Spaniards around the time of the American Revolution, they’d done some weird transformation of the locals. Naturally, after the Spanish retook control, Paraguay got a lot more like your typical Spanish colony—you know, rape, forced labor, some nice looking-churches built out of Indian bones—but the Guarani were different.

There was a 19th-c. dictator of Paraguay who was so honest he wouldn’t even accept his salary, returned every penny to the treasury. You get a lot of dictators south of the border, but not the kind that hand back money. That was Paraguay: crazy, but in a pretty impressive way. Even the local Indians, the Guarnai, had been warped in a good way by their time in the Jesuits’ commune; they had pride and they mixed with the whites on something kind of close to equal terms. That made them natural recruits for an effective army, and more than a match for the average Latin conscript, the kind of cannon fodder Santa Ana spent at the Alamo. The Paraguayans believed in their country, fought by choice, and even had a bigger army than their three opponents’ armies put together: at the start of the war in1864, Paraguay had 50,000 men in uniform, whereas Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay combined only had about half that.

Paraguay was ruled by the Lopez family, and they ran the place like a small business, keeping the money but investing most of it back into growing the place. And the kind of growth that mostly interested the Lopezes was military. Like Japan, another 19th-century up-and-comer, Paraguay spent a lot of foreign exchange on hiring the best military technicians and advisers Europe had to sell. And they did it smart, too, putting money into basic infrastructure like telephone lines and rail track, not just chrome bayonets.

If you’re good with numbers, you may be wondering how a war fought between fairly small forces like these could come close to the US Civil War in total death toll. The answer’s simple: the war started out semi-clean, but it didn’t stay that way, and most of the dead were Paraguayan civvies.

Paraguay’s men fought like jaguars while they lasted, and when they were all dead, Paraguay’s women and children fought on. Until they were dead, too. Total war doesn’t always start out no-mercy, kill-em-all; but when you’re fighting a small, tough country that just won’t give up, sooner or later you’re either going to either give up or resort to massacre.

That’s what Sherman was saying with that “War is Hell” comment that’s always being misquoted. He meant it SHOULD be, and he proceeded to show Georgia and the Carolinas how it’s done. He figured it was the only way to slap a country as tough and crazy as the Confederacy into surrender. You may remember we had a similar problem with a little place called Imperial Japan, and had to slap them around a little rough, too. Of course the official story with Sherman is that he burned houses and crops but didn’t actually take it to mass rape and murder. Me, I’ve always had my doubts about that. You take a bunch of young male chimps, put ’em in uniform, and tell them it’s open season on the enemy, I can’t really see them settling for the livestock when the lady of the house is so durn cute with that s’uthin drawl an’ awl. And once they’re done with her, it’s standard practice to quiet her up, her and anybody else in the house, with bayonets.

But then that’s me and people are always telling me I’m “cynical,” whatever that means. (I mean, either you’re right or you’re wrong; and if you’re right, how is that “cynical”?) So let’s say for the moment that Sherman’s boys didn’t massacre. Well, they were the exception, because that’s how total war is done, and that’s sure as hell how it was done in the later stages of the war against Paraguay.

Before we get down to the details, I want a moment of respect, or maybe “cynical” chuckles, at how hard it must be to be a Paraguayan. All that suffering and heroic exploits and slaughtered ancestors and nobody except a few nationalist fanatics in Brazil and Argentina even know about it. Paraguay has to win as the Rodrigo Dangerfield of heroic countries: no respecto.

Well, I’m here to fix that. Paraguay struck first, declaring war on Brazil in December 1864—countries used to do that, you know, “declare war”—one of those quaint old customs like high collars—and to prove they meant it, Lopez himself led the Paraguayan Army north into the Mato Grosso. This was a nasty tract of Brazil even by Brazilian standards, a low-rent jungle northeast of Paraguay. You don’t have to be a genius on the Subotai or Belisarius level to figure that isolation is an advantage on defense but a huge liability on offense, so the Paraguayans were more brave than smart to start with an invasion. But that’s them all over: as brave and stupid as a pitbull on the freeway.

They were lucky to be invading Brazil, because Brazil had nothing whatsoever in the area. This was one of the most remote parts of the country, and it took months to get troops down from the populated parts of Brazil to face the Paraguayans. And when the Brazilians did drag their sorry asses into battle, they made fools of themselves. Brazil has always been one of those places that specialize in internal security rather than nation-vs-nation fighting. If you want some annoying shoeshine kid or street urchin shot and dumped in a swamp, hire a Brazilian cop. Job’s as good as done. But actual fighting, against people who are armed and expecting trouble? That ain’t the Brazilian way.

Unlike the Confederacy, the other biggest slave-based economy in the Americas, the Brazilian elite didn’t like to fight. And unlike the Confederates, they sent their black slaves to do it for them. Anybody who could afford it just sent a few black slaves. And funny thing, the slaves weren’t that great troops. Slaves fight pretty well sometimes, which is one of the depressing features of history most people don’t like to think about—the way so many slaves are eager to die for Massa—but these must’ve been your smarter slaves, because they weren’t into it at all. The Paraguayans rolled over them every time they met, and that was usually by accident if the Brazilian rank-and-file had anything to say about it.

The Brazilian Army was the real Mel Brooks character in this screenplay: they didn’t manage to march to the Paraguayan frontier until 1867, and by the time they got there, their grand expeditionary force had been hacked away by malaria and other bug-borne killers to about 1500 men. They fought one battle against the first Paraguayan force they met—I mean, a shame to come all that way and not come back with even one decent war story—despite the fact that the Paraguayans had gotten bored waiting in the jungle for their Brazilian opponents to show. When the grand Brazilian expedition finally met a small force of Paraguayan cavalry at Laguna, they instantly fled back to the plantation, to resume the wonderful life of being slaves in the sugarcane fields in dear old Brazil.

So far Paraguay was winning and looking good doing it. But the trouble with being one of these undersized super-countries is that early victories go to your head and you start thinking you can take on a whole army, like Uma Thurmann with her Ginzu knife in Tokyo. Paraguay was as high on victory as Germany in 1941, so tweaked on war that in March 1865 the Lopez family decided to take on another country: Argentina. And here again it was like a midget version of the European War of 1939-1945: at first the Paraguayans scored miraculous, against-the-odds victories, one after the other. They took the Argentine province of Corrientes. This wasn’t an outback like Mato Grosso, but important and basic Argentine land. Except now it was Paraguay’s land, and Lopez was determined to keep marching toward blue water, and win his homeland a piece of the coastal pie he’d call “Greater Paraguay.”

Man, there’s nothing more deadly than these “Greater Whatever” plans. If your country starts talking like that, you better start putting your assets into offshore havens, because church is about out. The Paraguayans were about to learn that modern war puts logistical strength and flexibility above sheer guts. The same lesson the Confederacy and the Reich and the Imperial Japanese learned, and in the same hard way.

See, Brazil’s army might be useless but they had a navy, and a pretty decent one. In that part of South America 140 years ago, there were no roads to speak of; you got around by river. The Brazilian navy was twice the size of Paraguay’s and unlike the army was considered a respectably place to work if you were part of the white Brazilian elite. So it had decent training, funding, and morale, unlike the army.

In 1865, the same year Grant finally ground down Lee, the Brazilian navy beat the Paraguayan navy in the river battle of Riachuelo. The Paraguayan navy fought as well as you’d expect, but it was outgunned twice over, and numbers do tell when both sides have decent morale.

That battle was a lot like the Union victory at Vicksburg (but a lot faster); it meant that the enemy heartland was opened up to grinding, a war of attrition, where money, industrial base and coast control can be sure of beating sheer courage over time. In that way, this war was a lot like our Civil War: key river naval battle leads to Phase Two, Total War to destroy enemy civilian morale.

Like the Army of Northern Virginia, the Paraguayans held the invaders at bay longer than any sane military man could have predicted. For two years, from 1866-1868, the Paraguayan forts at the junction of the Paraguay and Parana, the two big rivers, kept the foreigners out. But like Lee or, say, Phyrrus, the Paraguayans, with a total population of maybe 1.5 million, couldn’t afford this kind of bravery. It was national suicide: at the battle of Tuyuti in 1866, they not only lost control of the field but lost more men in a few hours than they’ve been able to replace in a century.

There was plenty of room for Paraguay to show how heroic it was, in brave last stands nobody has ever heard of, like—let’s see if I can even spell this right—Curupaity, where a small garrison held off a force of 25,000 Argentines and Brazilians, killing an incredible 5000 attackers in one day.

But like the Union, the Brazilians were slowly learning to dump their incompetent commanders and develop a decent health service and supply corps. Over time, that made sure they’d win, especially with naval control of the rivers. The Paraguayans still fought smart, but sometimes the new breed of Brazilian commanders fought smart now too. Like the way the new Brazilian general Caxias, who’d been ordered to attack 18,000 Paraguayans who’d fortified Piquissiri, bypassed the strong point, mopped up the territory it was meant to block off from the enemy, then took it from the rear.

By 1869 it was as hard to find an able-bodied Paraguayan male as it was to find a white Virginian who could walk without crutches. The Brazilian/Argentine/Uruguayan army occupied the Paraguayan capital, Asuncion, and in a real smart, 20th-c. style move, set up a puppet local government. Lopez, the Paraguayan leader, fled to the hills. He still had the support of the people, and tried to start a guerrilla war…but the Brazilians showed they understood Maoist theory before Mao was even born. Mao said the people are the water, and the guerrillas are the fish who swim in it. The Brazilians just drained the pond the old-fashioned way: by killing every Paraguayan they came across. This is the phase of war where even lousy troops can look good: bayoneting kids and burning houses. And this is when Paraguay’s children proved themselves in a useless cause, like those Hitlerjugend junior high kids who actually held off the Red Army outside Berlin for a few weeks. At the battle—if you can call it that—of Acosta Nu, a force of 3500 Paraguayan children and a few women fought against 20,000– yes, twenty thousand!—invaders… until they were overwhelmed.

But here again, war doesn’t necessarily reward bravery, especially bravery in a lost cause. Paraguay ended the war a total ruin, destroyed more thoroughly than the Confederacy, post-Hitler Germany, or Japan. If you try to give an estimate of the death toll among Paraguayans, you just wind up starting another war—an online war. But the estimates start at about half the population. Half. Paraguay went from a contender, a little crazy brave Spanish-speaking Prussia, to a punchline. Worse yet, the country that benefited the most was… Argentina. I mean, damn.

This article first appeared in The eXile on December 26, 2007

Would you like to know more? Gary Brecher is the author of the War Nerd. You can read his newest dispatches and articles at the NSFWCorp (

The War Nerd Book Cover

Click the cover, buy the book!

Read more: , Gary Brecher, eXile Classic, The War Nerd

Got something to say to us? Then send us a letter.

Want us to stick around? Donate to The eXiled.

Twitter twerps can follow us at


Add your own

  • 1. censored  |  August 18th, 2013 at 5:07 pm

    Well,i liked it, but what you’re just not getting is that Paraguay is only there for Brazil and Argentina not to fight over their boundaries, just like Uruguay. Kind of the ones that separate France and Germany. They never were a real country. Of course that might just be Argentinian elitism speaking.

  • 2. Kevin  |  August 20th, 2013 at 9:26 am

    Welcome back! It’s been a while.

  • 3. Chav  |  August 28th, 2013 at 8:09 am

    Write about Syria nerd! It’s urgent.

  • 4. nampa  |  September 2nd, 2013 at 2:51 pm

    I just let my nsfwcorp membership lapse. It was a high quality Nation meets hipster aesthetic. I enjoyed it, but I was searching for the exile/exiled. The combination of truth, irreverence, expat male-centered counter culture is what has made me such a long-term fan.

  • 5. JakeA  |  September 5th, 2013 at 8:41 am

    Hurray, a new update!

    I gotta ask, what would YOU have done if you were El Presidente Senior Brecher? Where did he go wrong and right?

    It’s a shame Paraguay got raped from all ends… I guess endless manpower and resources are more powerful than small but super-strong.

  • 6. Daniel Josh A.  |  September 12th, 2013 at 1:21 am

    As a Paraguayan citizen, I applaud your article.
    More people should know about that terrible war.

  • 7. H. Amsterdam; Netherlands  |  October 1st, 2013 at 7:22 am

    COMMS NOTE: No need to publish this; only trying to raise editorial standards.

    Please help the author w/ the Spanish language horrors (not errors). It’s Guaraní, not anything close enough. That title “El Guerro el Mas Stupido” is American’s Spanglish and definitely, positively in the wrong grammatical gender; it’be: ‘La Guerra Mas Estupida’. If being anally retentive about it: ‘La Guerra Más Estúpida’. Not making a comprehensive list of errors but Rodney Dangerfield’s looser line is: No respeto. Oh, and Rodrigo is not Rodney in neither Spanish nor English …



  • 8. adrian  |  October 12th, 2013 at 11:45 am

    Well, Argentina wasn’t so benefited by this , the more benefited were british capitalist and some argentinean big fishes. Paraguay was the only country with no debts around here before the war.
    Paraguay didn’t started it just because it was too macho. We started it because sooner or later there was going to be a war with Brazil, Brazil intervented in uruguayan civil war to lead paraguayans into war, so they can look like the victims.
    Main objetive of all that was to destroy Paraguay’s independent progress and become the rulers of south america, and it worked.
    The thing was premeditated and not just by Brazil but also Argentina, Uruguay was just the empire’s and argentina’s bitch, i mean, the new uruguayan governement had to pay them for the help in their own civil war.
    Still Lopez did was guilty for doing what he should have known was a mistake. Fight against three nations with far more resources isn’t a very good idea.
    You caught the main idea, but the thing was deeper.
    And to the first coment: paraguay was one of the most advanced countries around here, argentinean propaganda said they were going to bring civilization to us, but many of their soildiers goed chained to war and they solded paraguayan prisioners as slaves. Most argentinean soldiers had never seen a telegraph before they get to paraguayan land.
    Many argentineans were against the war, even many correntineans considered themselves as paraguayans and joined us and others reveled against their own country, justice and equality was deficient at Argentina, those things were better here, it wasn’t a paradise but it was good.
    Sorry for any mistake a could have done in my spell, i’m paraguayan and learned english just by myself (schools are crappy around here)

  • 9. adrian  |  October 12th, 2013 at 11:48 am

    Wow that’s longer than i expected i look like a bitching stupid kid!

  • 10. boom  |  October 20th, 2013 at 8:49 pm

    dude, start writing again. what the heck are you doing ?

  • 11. Boiled Frog  |  October 25th, 2013 at 9:43 am

    Doesn’t the Bush family own a gigantic ranch in Paraguay with full on security hardware?

    War for glory is the essence of extinction, perhaps future military recruits would benefit from reading this column before signing up.

    The pioneers of a peaceful world are the youth who refuse military service.

  • 12. Cagone  |  January 19th, 2014 at 5:06 pm

    Really interesting, thanks.

  • 13. Samson  |  February 26th, 2014 at 2:01 am

    Uh, I know it was kind of a side point, but “battle deaths” only made up about a third of the deaths in the American civil war. The big killer was “disease, etc”. The old champ still held the title at that time.

    Otherwise, thanks for the info on the Paraguayan history. Also good to learn about new topics. 🙂

  • 14. Jack Boot  |  March 6th, 2014 at 10:32 am

    Token niggle: Two-thirds of US Civil War deaths (ie, 400,000) were caused by disease or infected wounds.
    Otherwise, great article!

  • 15. Slur  |  March 29th, 2014 at 9:48 am

    Was it really necessary to use the slur “dyke”?

  • 16. Ron  |  June 20th, 2014 at 2:47 am

    bla bla bla bla bla

  • 17. Ron  |  June 20th, 2014 at 2:50 am

    I think I’m edgy because I’m not politically correct. How original and daring am I?

  • 18. D. Jones  |  June 22nd, 2014 at 8:16 pm

    Nice to see you still here Gary (after x years of not checking in).

    Your distinctive style and candour are unique – don’t change nothin’.

  • 19. Milixo  |  January 10th, 2015 at 3:00 pm

    I’m one of the extremist nationalist from Brazil you talk about.
    The paraguayan attackers at Mato Grosso didn’t stay long, nor did they entered deep over our borders there. The first response to get there took a year to do so and had the objective to get they “from behind”, but the Paraguayan kind of knew the plan all along, resulting in the Laguna Retreat. These first troopers weren’t slaves, but the standing army at Rio, and most died by Cholera. You kind of forget about the hand of the British empire at this war, and that in the late war most of the brazilian troops comprised of volunteers (Os Voluntários da Pátria). Good analysis on brazilian security forces, though.

  • 20. karai-pyhare  |  January 22nd, 2015 at 11:16 pm

    As a paraguayan citizen I thank you War Nerd. I haven’t laughed so much since reading the tvtropes description of Triple Alliance War.
    Several things you extended too much upon and others were too short. Can’t tell if you ran out of writing space or sources to cite.
    Just small details are missing, such as this first dictator and founder of the Paraguayan nation. His last name was Francia and among other notable state measures he forced the spanish elite to marry out of their caste with guarani women, consolidating even more our mestizo character.
    Most of our history has to do with France in one way or another. Lopez went to study military tactics there, and some argued that Lopez fancied himself a latinamerican Napoleon. Even our national flag is based upon the french one.
    You play Argentina as the true winner and it’s funny, because they only got their territory back in all the bargain (Brazil extended theirs). They were about to claim more when Rutherford B. Hayes acted as arbitrator and said (probably) “it ain’t proper christian to let these poor people who suffered through this horrible war a tiny strip of land, let’s give them the Chaco”. Only that the Chaco Boreal desert actually belonged to Bolivia, which caused another war you could talk about (it was even parodied in Tintin’s “The Broken Ear”)
    As a fun sidenote, the “y” in all guarani names reads as the “u” in “thursday”

  • 21. Gabriel  |  May 4th, 2015 at 12:20 pm

    I loved the article. I just wanted to point out something i read in the comments. Paraguay was a republic when Argentina wasn’t. Paraguay was a solid block when argentinean provinces were still fighting against each . So stop saying Paraguay had to be an argentinean province or a brazilian state, because as a Paraguayan, it’s offensive. Paraguay has an unique identity that neither Brazil nor Argentina has. So for those commenters, do your research better.

  • 22. Blanca  |  August 25th, 2016 at 4:26 am

    I enjoyed reading this article and I know is not a book. so you couldn’t go deeper. However I think that from the Paraguayan point of view, they were defending their territory, I will do the same thing too if someone trying to get in and take over my house, in that sense I don’t think it was stupid. Also can someone tell me how the British benefit from this? This is not the first time I heard about it.

  • 23. Victor Franco  |  September 23rd, 2016 at 5:54 am

    Born in Paraguay and lived here for maybe 5 years but mostly I was abroad. I came back to retire …. anyway, after now a year here, I can tell you that this “triple alliance” war left only corrupted, selfish, uneducated, thief, dishonest … Etc. people behind. Most foreigner s like Paraguayans and Paraguayans like foreigners but they can stab you in the back anytime. This the kind of people that the war left behind. Sad … Very sad.

  • 24. Ken  |  May 11th, 2017 at 6:41 pm

    The death toll for the American Civil War has been increased 600 thousand to 750 thousand and possibly up to 850 thousand. All but less than a hundred of them were male. Based upon populations than and now, that would be like having 6.5 million males die in four years.

  • 25. Pepe Villa  |  May 26th, 2017 at 2:08 pm

    Actually, the bloodiest conflict in the Western hemisphere has been the Mexican Revolution (1910-1919) and its 1 million deaths (remember this Pancho Villa guy, who invaded the US?)

Leave a Comment

(Open to all. Comments can and will be censored at whim and without warning.)


Required, hidden

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed