
A few weeks ago, the Daily Mail wrote about a low-ranking British diplomat named James Hudson who was caught on hidden camera by the FSB (formerly the KGB, formerlier the MVD, formerlierer the NKVD, formerliest the Cheka) getting it on with two Russian hookers in a Yekaterinburg brothel. The paper published a couple of frame grabs from the video, but I wanted to check out the raw footage for myself. It looked like one of those classic sex scandals set up to blackmail someone into cooperation, and there’s nothing cooler than being able to watch real spy games in action. So I headed straight for kompromat.ru, Russia’s biggest muckraking/political scandal news site.
If the video doesn’t load, click here. The only promise we’ll make is that it’s not kiddie snuff porn.
In terms of porn quality, the FSB snake camera crew could’ve done a bit of a better job with composition and timing, but the fact is they didn’t have much to work with. Hudson is a bit of chub, his bitch of an ex-wife said as much: “He let himself go… He never wore glasses and he was thin. I’m glad I got out when I did.” But no one said a damn thing about the hookers being fat, too. What was the FSB thinking sending in such subpar seductresses?
One of them was particularly bad, with a huge blubbery fender swinging from her front end. But for all their principals’ telegenic failings, the spies at least did their homework. Or maybe they just lucked out. Whatever the case, it’s pretty obvious from the video that Hudson is into the chunky chicks. When confronted with two prostitutes, a man will inevitably, subconsciously choose a favorite. Hudson hardly pays any attention to the other hooker in the room, perfectly content rubbing sweaty lard sacks with the one that reminds him of his womenfolk back home; loose, pasty skinbags full of beer and fish ‘n’ chips.
Hudson clearly has a sick side as well, because the only thing he can think of doing with the better-looking whore is to have her sit on his face and jump up and down. Sick, and dangerous. If Hudson keeps up this kind debauchery, he’s gonna end up looking like Baron Harkonnen.

Anyways, I’m getting a bit sidetracked here. I didn’t mean to do a point-by-point sex tape review. I wanted to talk about Russia’s system of kompromat, or “compromising information.”
Russians still like to settle political and business disputes the way men have been settling them since the cave days: with beatings, disappearances, mysterious suicides, strange poisonings, and good old-fashioned summary executions. But these days in Russia you can’t go around offing people like you used to, especially when you’re dealing with high-powered businessmen and politicians. And anyway, Russia is a democratic country now. One must keep up appearances.
This is where kompromat comes in handy. Put simply, kompromat sites are just news aggregators like any other. They collect relevant and interesting news stories, and also offer a service for politicians and businessmen. For a fee, they’ll post a link to whatever story you can provide them, no matter how ridiculously fake or outrageous. If the client doesn’t have his own fake news agency to publish the article, kompromat sites can post it for you on one of the many seemingly legitimate blogs they maintain for just such situations. The more popular a kompromat site, the more money it can charge.
But not every kid off the street can open his own kompromat site. Posting damaging info on high-powered people can quickly get you disappeared without proper protection. No one will come out and admit it, but all of the dozens of scandal sites are backed by some sort of powerful government agency, which uses its kompromat portal to launch smear campaigns against their rivals. Russia has a draconian array of armed government agencies: There’s the FSB (sort of like a FBI-CIA hybrid), the GRU (an elite CIA), the current MVD (federal cops), and the FCS (a mix between border patrol and the FBI); and these are just the top of the pigpile. These groups are always engaged in behind-the-scenes turf wars for businesses, smuggling routes, and government funds.
About a year ago, I did a story on Russia’s answer to Matt Drudge. Sergei Gorshkov founded Russia’s first and most popular scandal site, kompromat.ru. That’s the one I got the sex video from. Back then, his competitors estimated he made somewhere around $1 million USD a year, tax free. He supposedly also had offers to sell his low-tech site for $10 million, but the bastard wouldn’t go below $15 million, firm.

Want us to stick around? Donate to The eXiled.
New! Twitter twats can now follow us at twitter.com/exiledonline
Got something to say to us? Then send us a letter.
Read more: america, corruption, gorshkov, journalism, kompromat.ru, Russia, scandal, the atlantic, Washington Post














14 Comments
Add your own1. FSB Agent 008 | July 28th, 2009 at 1:26 pm
America is corrupt shitty country? You could knock me down with a feather…
2. rick | July 28th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
Are you doing the fat-obsessed KNOW column, too, Yasha? That McMansion landscape is getting to you, man. Bail and head for NY, where you can at least look at girls. Fat girls destroy society, and are the root of the catatonic torpor the eXile has always railed against. A community without hot chicks will atrophy to a general emotional state of premature oldness. That’s independent of whether you’re getting laid: it’s incestuous, built into the grotesquely de-sexualized interpersonal dynamics.
3. az | July 28th, 2009 at 4:43 pm
Honesty makes less money, duh.
4. Alexius | July 28th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
Well I was willing to back the guy up because a man should be able to visit a brothel in peace. However, after seeing him let a hooker sit on his face…he deserves whatever he gets. He seems to be a little unclear on the concept.
5. Michael B | July 28th, 2009 at 7:26 pm
He’s banging hookers without a condom on and and going down on them?
Alexius is right, he gets what he deserves.
6. gang hobomaker | July 29th, 2009 at 1:45 am
you’re damn right yasha about those hookers. here’s a better selection, courtesy of glorious nation of moldova:
[INFO] http://social.moldova.org/news/202496-eng.html
[VIDEO] http://www.blogcatalog.com/search.frame.php?term=ioan+nuica+video&id=915d8583aed1715aa011ad060faaf4ad
and the second:
[INFO] http://english.hotnews.ro/stiri-top_news-5981752-video-new-sex-scandal-the-republic-moldova-main-role-the-communists-candidate-for-chisinaus-town-hall.htm
[VIDEO] http://www.politik.md/?view=articlefull&viewarticle=1294
http://www.unimedia.md/?mod=news&id=12111
enjoy!
7. Kalashkova | July 29th, 2009 at 8:26 am
‘one that reminds him of his womenfolk back home; loose, pasty skinbags full of beer and fish ‘n’ chips.’
I am tempted to tell you to Fuck off. Such blatant stereotypes. At least we’re not as fat as Americans.
Although if you went out in any British town centre on a Friday night, you would not be far from the truth.
8. Mac | July 29th, 2009 at 9:01 am
Alexius, pearls of wisdom there.
9. jindi | July 29th, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Haha, you’re right. I never thought about it like that but this may be the only way to have honest and objective news in a capitalist system.
10. Epicman | July 29th, 2009 at 11:14 pm
Jindi - Yasha is making fun of that model. You will never have an honest news network paid for in cash, because some sides, the pharmaceutical companies for instance, will always have more cash then those opposing them. The News Network should report all sides, not sides that make the most money. The model prevents start ups, and shrinks the Middle Class, showing Capitalism for the joke it is. And BTW, there are more economic systems our there then Capitalism and Communism.
11. Frankenblank | July 30th, 2009 at 4:21 am
What gutless poofters some of you blokes are, scared dickless of a hooker’s cunt in the face. I’ve been down on over 150 Chinese whores and I’ve never caught so much as a cold from it. Don’t you know that hetero sex is about cunt worship? If all you want is to get sucked off and give it to someone good and hard, you might as well be gay.
12. Anonymous | July 30th, 2009 at 5:31 pm
“Subconsciously”? “Subconsciously”?! The rest of the article is great, but that’s pure bullshit and you know it. Of *course* we choose the hotter one, and know that that’s exactly what we’re doing. Anything less would be stupid.
13. Daar | July 31st, 2009 at 5:31 am
@11 “Hey! Let’s listen to random-person-from-internet about going down on whores, I’m sure nothing bad can come off it! HE SAYS SO!!!”
14. Muzhik | August 4th, 2009 at 2:04 pm
i assumed that the FSB edited out the parts where he fucks the relatively hotter girl, just so that he would look worse.
Leave a Comment
(Open to all. Comments can and will be censored at whim and without warning.)
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed