Khloe Kardashian, Donna D’Errico of Baywatch, former Miss USA Susie Castillo, Playboy nude-model Tammy Banovac, Jesse Ventura and Alex Jones: to most Americans, a list of names like that sounds like the punch-line to an elaborate pop culture comedy routine. Or maybe the cast of another John Waters kitsch-flick, or another one of those degrading reality shows. If that’s what you’re thinking, then you’re clearly one of the brainwashed “sheeple.” You can’t appreciate that Khloe Kardashian & Friends are modern-day American Martyrs– victims of TSA airport gate screener “Nazis,” a jack-booted “Gestapo” who “gate-rape” and “genocide” Americans on a daily basis. Khloe, Donna, Tammy and Susie aren’t sheeple, though–they’re our modern-day George Washingtons and Thomas Jeffersons fighting for our constitutional liberties, and some day our children may owe their freedom to Khloe Kardashian’s Army.
That’s one way of looking at it. Anther way is that Kardashian and D’Errico represent the sorts of martyrs-to-inanity that could only make sense to a generation raised on trash-reality TV.
Whether they’re freedom-fighters or celebritard publicity-whores, we leave that up to our readers to decide. To help you, we’ve put together a quick dossier on Khloe’s Army of Celebrity Martyrs to TSA Tyranny:
#1: Khloe Kardashian
Kardashian sisters bravely head into battle against TSA tyranny
Last December, Khloe Kardashian–the Jan Brady of the Sisters Kardashian–claimed she was the victim of a TSA “rape.” While every other victim of rape in human history has found the experience almost too traumatic to talk about, Khloe went straight to that most ideal of forums to disclose one’s rape trauma–George Lopez Tonight: “Well, they basically just are raping you in public,” Kardashian chirped. “The people are so aggressive! It’s like, ‘Chill out, you didn’t find anything on me yet, calm down.’ They say, ‘OK, I’m going to be patting you down and I’m going to be touching the crease of your ass.’ That is so inappropriate!”
“Inappropriate” was a word many rape-victims’ activists associated with Khloe Kardashian. Jessica Sears Brown, Co-founder of Pandora’s Project, told reporters: “Comparing the two is inappropriate and cheapens the devastation of sexual violence. We understand that Ms. Kardashian found her screening to be uncomfortable. However, I highly doubt she’ll need years of therapy to rebuild her sense of safety and trust in the world after undergoing a TSA screening.”
Hollywood uber-lawyer Gloria Allred agreed: “Words matter and the word ‘rape’ should be used with caution and with great respect for the victims who have been forced to endure it. It is completely inappropriate to use that word for scans or pat downs at airports.”
Khloe just couldn’t get a break, as more and more rape victims’ advocates slammed her poor taste in analogies. Jazmin Robles of the Santa Barbara Rape Crisis Center told Radar Online,
“I think it was an ill-informed thing for her to say. It was a very strong comment to make because rape is defined as ‘forceful penetration’ and a lot of young women look up to celebrities like the Kardashians.
“We are all about educating people about rape at our Center and by using the word in this context it blurs the issue as to what it actually constitutes. Maybe Khloe Kardashian is not educated enough on this subject to be talking about it in the context of airport security.”
Clearly, they just don’t understand the pain that Khloe suffered. It’s like, everyone thinks she just exaggerated it for publicity or something, omg!
#2: Donna D’Errico
Martyrs inspire others into action, and the timing of Khloe Kardashian’s martyrdom suggests she may have been inspired to go public as a TSA “gate-rape” victim by Donna D’Errico, ex-wife of Nikki Sixx, and co-star of Baywatch, Baywatch Nights, and the straight-to-video Candyman 3. Just a couple of days before Kardashian’s TSA “rape” D’Errico complained to AOL News that she’d been singled out for a full-body scan, while her boyfriend– Roy J. Bank, president of Merv Griffin Entertainment—“sailed through with no problems, which is rather ironic in that my boyfriend fits the stereotypical ‘look’ of a terrorist when his beard has grown in a bit, which it was that evening.”
While D’Errico appeared to be unhappy at the TSA’s failure to racially-profile her boyfriend, she wouldn’t go so far as to suggest she’d been singled out in a TSA conspiracy against a celebrity—“I’m not sure whether they had recognized me or not. If they did, they didn’t say anything,” she told AOL News. Whatever the case, D’Errico claimed to be “humiliated” by the TSA agents’ “whispering” to each other and “smiling,” suggesting to D’Errico that she’d been the victim of X-Ray scan “peeping Toms.”
Unfortunately, not everyone believed Donna’s story–and it wasn’t just because she’d whined that the TSA hadn’t racially-profiled her terrorist-looking boyfriend. Cynics and nay-sayers pointed out that some things didn’t make sense. Like how D’Errico claimed that the lascivious male TSA perverts never gave her the option of a pat-down. Think about it: What sort of TSA “rapist” would pass up the opportunity to run his perverted statist hands all over D’Errico’s curvaceous body, instead forcing her to pose for a shitty X-ray photo that may or may not show her body contours. And it’s not like these TSA Nazis weren’t patting down everyone else, including her son–it’s that they didn’t even give her the option of a pat-down. Some totalitarian Nazis they turned out to be! D’Errico seemed actually offended by the fact that they made her son do both the scan and the pat-down, but not her:
“They never told me that they were going to be conducting a full-body scan, or that I had the option of being searched instead. Had they explained what they were doing, I would have opted for the search. As a matter of fact, my son was made to not only go through the full-body scan, but they also conducted a pat-down search on him as well.”
Either they were more interested in her son than in her, or…but nah, only Sheeple would accuse D’Errico of shameless publicity-slumming!
Then of course there’s the whole “but you’ve spent your life posing nude” issue. When the AOL News reporter reminded D’Errico that she’d spent her entire career exposing her private parts for public consumption—Playboy Playmate of the Month spread, Baywatch episodes in bikinis as skimpy as dental floss, posing for Hustler magazine with ex-husband Nikki Sixx—D’Errico suddenly forgot her victim-of-humiliation story, and got her Tea Party ranting-about-her-rights on: “I posed for Playboy 15 years ago. I was on ‘Baywatch‘ 13 years ago. I could have stopped or changed my mind at any time. None of those conditions are present when TSA decides for you that you will consent to being scanned or felt up, or you simply won’t be allowed your constitutional right to travel from one place to another freely.”
Oh and speaking of Tea Party Libertarians and Koch Whores running the anti-TSA publicity campaign, guess who Donna D’Errico supports?
#3: Tammy Banovac (aka “Tammy Lynn Brewer”)
Donna D’Errico wasn’t the only Clinton-era Playboy nudie-turned-martyr of a TSA “sexual assault.”
Last November, a 52-year-old “retired surgeon” showed up at Will Rogers Airport in Oklahoma City in a wheelchair, wearing nothing but a bra and panties beneath her trench coat. The “retired surgeon,” identifying herself as Tammy Banovac, claimed she was protesting against the TSA’s pat-downs: “If it happened anywhere else, it would have been sexual assault,” she told reporters.
Unfortunately for Banovac, her martyrdom was itself martyred, as some people in the media started thinking to themselves, “H’m, something doesn’t seem right about this.” So they checked into just who Tammy Banovac really was, and discovered that her real name was Tammy Lynn Brewer. And that discovery led to a strange paradox: The same woman claiming to be “outraged” over the TSA pat-down had posed nude in a 1997 Playboy spread featuring sexy nude dental girls.
But Banovac had an even better story that she kept hidden: She’s a “retired” dentist because she once killed a 7-year-old patient. Yes, back in the early 1990’s, sexy dentist Banovac-Brewer was such a reckless idiot that she killed a poor 7-year-old boy after pulling nine of his teeth in the back of a physical therapist’s office. For that, her license to practice was revoked, and she was charged with gross malpractice because she used a local anesthesia on the 7-year-old boy against the explicit orders of both the boy’s parents and his cardiologist. He died shortly after those nine teeth were yanked.
According to Oklahoma City TV station KOCO:
The boy suffered from tricuspic atresia, a congenital heart defect, and polycythemia, which caused high blood pressure, the board complaint document said.
The documents said Banovac practiced dentistry in Pima County in two locations; the first was a church and the second was a medical office using portable equipment.
However, Banovac didn’t have a license to practice in Pima County nor gave the board notice to inspect the locations, the documents said.
In 1993, the board said Banovac made false sworn statements during the investigation and found her guilty of gross malpractice of a medically compromised patient and was fined a penalty of $5,000.
In subsequent hearings the board unanimously voted to censure Banovac on two separate complaints. On both complaints she was fined $1,000 each.
Here is a news report from Phoenix TV:
But despite all of this, what the sheeple don’t understand is why Tammy Banovac stripped to her underwear and showed up in a wheelchair when she doesn’t even need a wheelchair. Isn’t that, you know, sort of exploitative and in bad taste? Answer: “She said she was not trying to draw attention to herself or make a scene,” as one media outlet reported. Nope–it was all about defending her liberties, and fighting against fascist TSA humiliation.
Spoken like a true Martyrtard!
#4: Susie Castillo
In 2003, Susie Castillo was crowned “Miss USA” and the world was her oyster. Eight years later, her resume logged yet another “canceled reality show” to her sputtering career as NBC’s “School Pride” went the way of Castillo’s other reality shows. Canceled shows, that is–such as the one-season dud, “America’s Prom Queen,” described by Salon.com as “a reality show that’s exactly as horrifying as that Stephen King movie ‘Carrie,’ except without all of the pig’s blood splattering all over the place.”
Which was downright effusive praise compared to the fate of Castillo’s last reality TV show disaster, “School Pride,” which not only received terrible ratings and reviews, but worse, was accused of faking reality at the expense of inner-city school children, and then leaving the school in worse shape than when they first arrived to “fix” it up.
According to the LA Times, “Local school officials reluctantly allowed a reality television show [‘School Pride’] onto campuses with promises of remodeling, then got stuck with a substandard paint job at one school and at another an embarrassing made-for-TV ‘reenactment’ of an event that never occurred.”
H’m, let’s see: Faking reality? Exploiting other people’s real problems for entertainment and fame? Sounds familiar? Nawww, don’t even think about it, folks!
A few months after “School Pride” was unceremoniously canceled, Susie Castillo filmed herself in Dallas Ft-Worth Airport giving the performance of a lifetime, crying that she’d been “molested” by a TSA screener during a pat-down, just as Khloe Kardashian and Tammy Banovac before her:
“That’s why I’m crying, that’s why I’m so upset. They’re making me choose to either get molested, because that’s what I feel like, or go through this machine that’s completely unhealthy and dangerous.”
Castillo posted her video of herself squirting more tears into her phone camera than Bugs Bunny managed in his Oscar-winning performance, and wouldn’t you know it, the video went viral:
Naturally, this had nothing to do with Castillo’s tanking reality-TV career, and everything to do with the highest possible motives:
“This isn’t about me,” she told ABC News. “Iit did happen to me, it’s not just about my rights, it’s about all rights, the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution is being violated.”
Indeed. Castillo’s website promoted her martyrdom video as a call to action rallying behind Martyr Susie. Readers were asked to sign a petition that she planned to take to Congress. About defending their liberties and stuff. Susie hoped her performance would inspire 1,000,000 freedom-loving Americans to sign her petition for her big presentation in Washington, DC; so far, 977 have signed the petition, meaning she’s a mere 999,003 signatures away from her goal!
And while signing up to defend their Constitutional liberties, visitors to susiecastillo.net were also invited to look at her acting reels and, you know, compare them to her performance at Dallas airport!
Here, check this acting reel out, boy can she act!
Wow, how is it possible that she’s not a star? Welp, that may be about to change. Just a couple of weeks after Castillo’s Dallas martyrdom performance, Texas state Rep. David Simpson, a far-right Tea Party Republican, introduced legislation criminalizing TSA pat-downs. Simpson was part of an insurgent group of Texas Tea Party Republicans who sought to oust the Jewish Republican Speaker of the Texas House and replace him with a Christian. Previously, Rep. Simpson had introduced a state Constitutional amendment further restricting abortions, a bill allowing concealed firearms on Texas college campuses, and blocked legislation that would outlaw “puppy mills.”
[Late note: for some reason, Castillo seems to have removed her video of her moving Dallas airport performance, although other versions can still be found.]
#5: Jesse Ventura
It was inevitable: The publicity-hounding host of a floundering quasi-reality show on TruTV, “Conspiracy Theory,” falls victim to the greatest conspiracy of the Third Millennium: The TSA. In January, Jesse Ventura filed a lawsuit against the TSA alleging, like Martyr Kardashian and Martyr Banovac and Martyr D’Errico before him, that the pat-downs and the TSA’s body imagining “meet legal definitions of unlawful sexual assault and unlawful video voyeurism.”
HONORABLE MENTION: Alex Jones, leader of the 9/11 Truth-Out movement and the Internet’s biggest promoter of TSA Gestapo oppression, is also leading the fight for American liberty. By leading a “mob” to storm the Texas state house building in Austin after Rep. David Simpson’s bill was allowed to die.
Watch as Alex Jones breaks it all down what’s really happening here: It has nothing at all to do with publicity-seeking or political theater, and everything to do with defending America’s civil liberties:
Yes folks, it’s all about defending our civil liberties. We sheeple may not understand it, but the intrepid celebrities of Khloe’s Army sure do. And thanks to them, some day we may be able to fly in such a way that only non-unionized private security employees pat us down, rather than unionized government workers. And that will make all of us a lot more free–if we can just earn enough money to fly, that is.
Mark Ames is the author of Going Postal: Rage, Murder and Rebellion from Reagan’s Workplaces to Clinton’s Columbine.
Click the cover & buy the book!
Read more: alex jones, david simpson, donna d'errico, fourth amendment, hustler, jesse ventura, khloe kardashian, koch, libertarian, nikki sixx, playboy, susie castillo, tammy banovac, Tea Party, tsa, Mark Ames, Koch Whores, Tea Party
Got something to say to us? Then send us a letter.
Want us to stick around? Donate to The eXiled.
Twitter twerps can follow us at twitter.com/exiledonline
33 Comments
Add your own1. matt | July 24th, 2011 at 6:40 pm
Well, kind of hard to hate on Khloe that much. Kardashian sister who trivializes rape and who has never experienced real suffering could be perceived as a step up from; Fat loudmouthed Kardashian sister.
2. hon kee | July 24th, 2011 at 8:36 pm
i see where you’re coming from, ames, and catching the astroturfing here was a great scoop, but at the same time i’m still incapable of facing up to the fact that everyone from “progressives” to “libertarians” were fooled by this so I’m going to pretend that the TSA is still a serious problem and threat because otherwise i’d have to admit that i was suckered, and so my answer is, “i wasn’t suckered, actually, you’re just a liberal democrat” or something like that
3. Punjabi from Karachi | July 24th, 2011 at 9:00 pm
Taking Alex Jones down a peg or two:
Always good in my books.
4. helplesscase | July 24th, 2011 at 9:28 pm
Man, this country fucking sucks.
5. Kristina B | July 24th, 2011 at 10:34 pm
“The same woman claiming to be “outraged” over the TSA pat-down had posed nude in a 1997 Playboy spread featuring sexy nude dental girls.”
I’m going to pretend in this comment that I don’t understand the connection here. A woman consents to be photographed nude, and is “sexy” (or at least, presents herself as such in a nude photograph taken with her consent) and then she strips in front of the TSA gate in a wheelchair and just happens to be filmed there–and you think I’ll sound like a sockpuppet if I say something like, “why is she therefore unable to legitimately express anger at being touched without her consent? even if the people touching her are TSA?”
Not sure if this sockpuppet 2.1 is working that well. Hold on, better talk to my boss at my marketing firm, Liberty and Freedomworks LLC
6. zuzu | July 24th, 2011 at 10:43 pm
But it does not feel to an average person going through Reigan airport security like you are in Gestapo because there’s a bit of a difference: at the airport security you walk into that machine, they make you spread your legs and put your hands behind your neck – kind of the way POWs do when they surrender to the enemy except that it’s not like that at all because you’re terrified when you’re a POW and usually you’re beaten and clubbed as well. Whereas with the Gestapo, you were often beaten, tortured and shot. Which, you know, is EXACTLY like the experience at Reigan airport (you’ll excuse my inability to spell that moron’s name, but I’m a libertard sockpuppet, and we’re even more illiterate and retarded than Reigan was).
I had something else to say here, where I try to sound reasonable and “you may be right, but also, think about what Khloe Kardashian went through” sort of thing, but I know you’re not buying it, so, well, back to sockpuppet’s User Manual!
7. SomethingSomething | July 24th, 2011 at 11:12 pm
Women are such prudes, nowadays.
8. Edmund Dorkey | July 24th, 2011 at 11:37 pm
Underboob!
Or is that a Kardashian Haboob?
http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011/07/25/159175.html
if you wanna win the super bowl / world series / etc., ya gotta tap a Kardashian sister.
9. Human Lamprey | July 25th, 2011 at 12:05 am
Pure comedy of the black, enervating, soul destroying type. You have to have masochistic tendencies to have been able to write so much on these people.
10. Erik | July 25th, 2011 at 2:38 am
The scariest part is the video with the MILF in the wheelchair. Right behind her, there’s what seems to be a perfectly normal, healthy boy. But he don’t even glance at her. Not once.
What’s happening to America?
11. Mike Flugennock | July 25th, 2011 at 6:28 am
Jesus Christ, Ames, what the goddamn’ deal, here?
Seven or eight years ago, when libertard sockpuppets like me didn’t speak out against the TSA’s abuses of the Constitution and personal liberty and dignity, I was never branded “pro-terrorist” because all I cared about was supporting Bush’s tax cuts and gutting of the EPA and all the rest.
Then Obama comes to power and now I’m pretending like I’m all upset about TSA “gate rape” you know like I’m some Donna D’Errico or something. Okay, it’s true that I’m a Koch astroturfer and a Teabagger. How fucked up is that? That’s how bad things are today in America, and while it’s true that the reason things are so fucked up is because of all the shit libertarian ideology, still, I have a question for you, sir:
What’s your goddamn’ problem, Ames? Which side are you on? Why aren’t you with the Kochs too? Why do you insist on not letting us bullshit the public?
Look, the TSA is the Nazi Gestapo, and if you don’t believe it, just go back again and watch what Khloe Kardashian had to say. If you don’t believe Khloe Kardashian and Tammy Banovac and Alex Jones, then clearly, Ames, you are just an Obama Democrat enforcing the two-party system, just like Glenn Greenwald once wrote. Glenn is on Khloe Kardashian’s side, why aren’t you?
12. Esperanto Lives | July 25th, 2011 at 6:45 am
The celebs that should be concerned about the TSA x-ray scanners are male actors who want to keep their medically small, laughable penises a secret, like Vincent Gallo, that “I’m a Mac” punk, and Brendan Fraser.
There’s real hypocrisy when z-list exhibitionist celebrities use an anti-TSA platform to draw attention to themselves, get publicity, and cynically make national security over air travel something that’s all about them.
What gets me is Donna D’Ericco’s objection to using the x-ray porn scanner. Is there is a single man in America alive during the Clinton years that hasn’t seen her cooch? For heaven’s sake, what is she worried about, anyway? It comes off as hilarious she’d complain about TSA people leering and slobbering over her naked body, when she only did that before millions.
Hilariously, Donna D’Errico always gets confused in my mind for Erika Eleniak, and I had to look her up to make sure they were different people. It reminds me of her fellow “hey it’s that guy” caliber actor Fred Thompson, who when he announced he was running, I assumed was Joe Don Baker.
Donna’s turn to cheesy Ron Paul Republicanism is totally unsurprising. Like so many other people associated with the hair metal scene and their brief flirtation with metal biker rebellion, eventually they return to their white-trash roots sooner or later and become Libertarian hick thugs. See also: Alice Cooper, Aerosmith.
I have nothing but sympathy for TSA screeners, who work with awful, arbitrary and invasive policies but who are working class people in a hard job they unfairly get nothing but shit for. It’s easier to put the blame on a bunch of low-wage and mostly powerless employees than our own hysteria and anxiety about what may be the safest way to travel.
13. Zoner | July 25th, 2011 at 8:18 am
The way the article was going I was afraid it was gonna lead up to a blurred nude photo of Jesse Ventura.
14. Kristina B | July 25th, 2011 at 10:25 am
o mighty eXiled monitor, i thank thee for changing those dumbfuck comments so that they do not pollute thy immaculate website. smite the libertards!
15. ☭ mouse ☭ | July 25th, 2011 at 11:42 am
I really don’t get the TSA bitching… have these people never been to a concert before? You get frisked for weapons and drugs, thats OK for that venue, but not when your getting on a fucking airplane???? Also yeah, I wouldnt want someone looking at my junk either, but then again, who really losing here? me, or the guy who has to look at fat naked xray pics of Americans all day? Most people going through those scanners are not models
16. DeeboCools | July 25th, 2011 at 12:36 pm
Luckily these people don’t seem to be getting very much attention for the anti-TSA cause. Huge surprise there. But nice connecting the dots.
17. DrunktankDan | July 25th, 2011 at 4:55 pm
Am I the only person that got a boner from all of that big, hot, jew muff?
Joking aside, I did have a fairly elaborate attempt at pretending that I was still very outraged at the TSA, even though that puts me right there with Khloe and Donna and the gang. Still, one thing’s for sure–sockpuppets are here to stay!
18. zirb | July 25th, 2011 at 6:12 pm
You’re not at all assuming that the TSA are “gate rapists” whereas I’m the type of commenter who’d say something stupid like “TSA agents don’t make us safer even though there hasn’t been an attack since 9/11.” Then I’d say, “Oh yeah? Prove it. Just because there wasn’t an attack, doesn’t meant there wasn’t an attack.”
Dang, sockpuppet 3.1 really has a lot of bugs to work out!
19. James Wilson | July 25th, 2011 at 8:05 pm
Alex Jones kinda looks like Chaz Bono. Someone should investigate that….
20. Pavel | July 26th, 2011 at 4:05 am
Ames you are dead right about the hypocracy of the celebs you discussed here!
Both sides just see us as sheeple, its important not to associate with neither of them
21. Tubman Chubaisovich Kompot-y | July 26th, 2011 at 10:05 am
If you look real close at that pic up top, I think that you can make out some camel-toe (hyphenated?).
22. Daniel | July 26th, 2011 at 3:07 pm
Ames, your outrage is misguided, again. Take a year off, reboot, and come up with something more compelling to write about.
My heart doesn’t bleed for TSA stooges, unionized or otherwise. Get real.
23. matt | July 26th, 2011 at 4:03 pm
James Wilson raises a valid point, have you ever actually seen those two in the same room at the same time.
24. Fnar | July 27th, 2011 at 2:33 am
Mark,
I write comments to you too often. I would consider offering advice to you, but then again, as a spineless sockpuppet who can only publish in the comments section while working a day job for the Kochs, who the fuck am I to give advice to anyone unless that advice is, “Please kill me, for I can no longer live the life of a corporate butt-maggot.”
Not everyone is literate enough to read “New Yorker” porridge. But everyone who is illiterate thinks the TSA is the Gestapo.
Best,
Fnar
25. anon | July 27th, 2011 at 2:08 pm
Ferfuxache Ames, you need to get out of the US. Have you got nothing better to do than gripe about the tea party and celebuatard non entities? Get off your sorry arse and give us mankind’s only alternative. Please.
26. vk | July 28th, 2011 at 2:47 am
sorry, but I fail to grasp why is it being groped and manhandled by a unionized government agent is somehow better than the situation we have now.
does knowing that the police have a powerful union and every sort of association protecting their interests make it feel better when the cop uses his bully club on your kidneys?
27. TheWeeper | August 2nd, 2011 at 5:13 pm
Um, i’m sitting here working for this pr firm doing “commenting” and i’m supposed to sound like i’m just a regular person, like the kind who says “um” rather than a typical sock-puppet, and here’s the thing–why hasn’t sockpuppet 3.1 come up with a way of dealing with the inanity of a paid-troll coming on a site pretending like he’s not bothered by an article, yet taking the time to post a comment that tries sounding all earnest and stuff? any other libertarian trolls out there have any suggestions for my boss on this?
28. Richard | August 5th, 2011 at 4:35 pm
Jim Goad is stalking you like a fangirl Ames, he still can’t get over having his sorry ass handed to him so he’s gonna get his big rich Koch brother to come and beat you up Ames, so you better watch out cuz it’s coming soon! On a really big website. Cuz you know, having bad things written about what a pig you are Ames–that’s like going to destroy your career! Yeah it’s true–especially if all these bad bad things are on a BIG website and it makes Ames even more famous, then yeah, that’s going to totally hurt Ames’ media career. Cuz you know how this stuff works! Just wait till this BIG website publishes all the bad stuff Ames has done–Ames’s career is totally over, man! Bad publicity is career death in our business, everyone knows that!
By the way Ames, the reason why Goad stalks you like a fanboy? If you were a girl, Goad would break your eye socket and bite your thumb the way he did to Skye Ryan, but since you’re a man who’s fighting real power, and since you’re a Jew and all, and Goad and Gavin McInnes don’t like Jews much, so instead he’s hiding behind rich corrupt Koch-funded scumbags to go after you.
So watch out! Hoo-wee!
By the way, that stuff you’ve collected about him being a prison informant? What’s the latest?
29. Richard | August 5th, 2011 at 6:30 pm
I think he mentioned something earlier about Breitbart.
30. Lozer | August 18th, 2011 at 8:19 pm
The whole point of calling it “groping” is because the Pr firms need to make it seem like it’s much worse than it is, so that retards come on comments section and call backscatter X-ray machines “the nude-scanner.” Is there really anything else to discuss here? Yes, libertarians hope that people follow whatever dumb celebrities do, because libertarians do everything for attention. But they are wrong.
31. W | August 22nd, 2011 at 3:49 pm
We should treat our celebrities specially. They are too important to the country to be treated so shabbily. They should be given a quick visual once over and allowed to pass quickly without pat downs or xrays. They are hardly terrorists. I think a special line should be available in major airports for celebrities and politicians. I also think that every citizen should lick the undersoles of their shoes after they go through the special lines, and that we should open our mouths and let them urinate into them.
32. anon | September 9th, 2011 at 9:16 pm
The worst part is that there are ongoing human rights abuses in the US – yet attention only seems to go to the civil liberties yapping types who for the most part don’t seem bothered by human rights issues. I don’t want to be an exile – that would imply returning. I just have to leave.
Good article.
33. Mark | October 5th, 2012 at 9:25 am
Whoever is writing this is a douche-bag, I know because I’m writing it and I know that I am a douchebag, all two well. In fact, I’m Charles Koch’s second-line taint douche technician, here to freshen up his grimy job creator taint any time of the day at the ring of bell. What is a taint douche? Well, it’s only something that productive members of society require because of all the hard work they put into creating jobs for the rest of us. The “publicity whore” straw man argument you built is disgusting. Who cares how C or D list these celebrities are, your 4th ammendment rights among others are being infringed on everyday. Either you get radiated by a dangerous machine or felt up by the TSA, I will not be felt up by the TSA because as Charles Koch’s personal taint-douche, I am forbidden to be used and/or handled by anyone other than Mr. Koch himself and not some big government weirdo. So yes lets laugh at these people speaking out. It makes us feel better to laugh at people actually trying to change things.
Leave a Comment
(Open to all. Comments can and will be censored at whim and without warning.)
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed